Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. DeGroote School of Business
  4. DeGroote School of Business Working Papers
  5. Michael Lee-Chin & Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies Working Paper Series
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/19077
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMiu, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Bogie-
dc.contributor.authorCubukgil, Evren-
dc.contributor.authorGiesinger, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorMichael Lee-Chin & Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies-
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-08T16:45:49Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-08T16:45:49Z-
dc.date.issued2015-04-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/19077-
dc.description52 p. ; Includes bibliographical references (pp. 35-37). ; "April 2015."en_US
dc.description.abstractWe examine two interrelated issues in risk-adjusted return on capital performance measurement: estimating hurdle rates and allocating capital to debt instruments in a portfolio. We consider a methodology to differentiate hurdle rates for individual debt instruments that incorporates obligor-specific information. These instrument-specific hurdle rates, which define the required compensation of the shareholders, enable a granular differentiation of systematic risk among debt contracts. Using the proposed approach, we show that the hurdle rate could be materially different among industry sectors and obligors of different credit quality. Profitability assessment could be significantly distorted if the difference in hurdle rates is ignored. Valuation Insight: Miu, Ozdemir, Cubukgil, and Giesinger consider the use by financial institutions of the risk-adjusted return on capital which is compared to the shareholders’ required rate of return to allow a financial institution to find out if an asset or a line of business is creating value for its shareholders. They find that using alternative instrument-specific risk-adjusted return measures is better and creates more value for shareholders.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMichael Lee-Chin & Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies Working Paper ; 2015-11-
dc.subjectCredit portfolio managementen_US
dc.subjectRAROCen_US
dc.subjectEconomic capitalen_US
dc.subjectCapital allocationen_US
dc.subjectHurdle rateen_US
dc.subjectTail risken_US
dc.titleDetermining hurdle rate and capital allocation in credit portfolio managementen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNoneen_US
Appears in Collections:Michael Lee-Chin and Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies
Michael Lee-Chin & Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies Working Paper Series

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sbv_wp_2015-11.pdf
Open Access
475.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue