Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/18421
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWalsh, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorQuach, Kevin-
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-15T19:16:38Z-
dc.date.available2015-10-15T19:16:38Z-
dc.date.issued2015-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/18421-
dc.description.abstractHemodialysis induces various symptoms in many patients. However, the type of dialysis symptoms induced and how they contribute to recovery time remains unclear. This study aims to understand patient experiences reporting dialysis recovery time and associated symptoms using three separate novel instruments developed for this study. We conducted a 13-week prospective cohort study in prevalent in-center hemodialysis patients and measured their recovery time using three instruments. Instrument A inquired how long it took to recover from the last dialysis treatment. Instrument B inquired recovery time from last treatment for each of 10 specified symptoms and Instrument C included symptom severity to Instrument B. Each instrument was used for each dialysis treatment for one week. We compared patient response and distribution of recovery time found with each instrument using mixed-effects logistic regression models. 118 participants were recruited from two centres of which 914 (86%) of 1062 expected responses were completed. Recovery time using instrument A resulted in more participants identifying some recovery time from dialysis (83 to 86%) as compared with Instrument B (66 to 80%, p = 0.001) and Instrument C (69 to 73%, p <0.001). The third visit of the week was associated with fewer patients reporting recovery time (p = 0.036). However, Instrument B (p = 0.016) and Instrument C (p < 0.001) showed a longer recovery time compared to the distribution of recovery time of Instrument A. Lack of energy was the most common symptom following dialysis (69 to 77% of all patients). Recovery time with Instrument A was a significant predictor of kidney-specific component scores and mental component score as measured by the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 instrument. Recovery time is complex, and includes different symptoms that vary in duration. Attempts to reduce recovery time may impact specific symptoms differentially.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectNephrologyen_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectDialysisen_US
dc.subjectMeasurementen_US
dc.titleThe Measurement of Recovery Time in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis for End-Stage Renal Diseaseen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Research Methodologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Quach_Kevin_201509_MSc.docx
Open Access
Quach_Kevin_201509_MSc1.64 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue