Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/16225
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPope, Spencer-
dc.contributor.advisorCorner, Sean-
dc.contributor.advisorMattison, Kathryn-
dc.contributor.authorCarruth, Stephanie-
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-28T15:14:19Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-28T15:14:19Z-
dc.date.issued2014-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/16225-
dc.description.abstractThis study provides an abstract look at the movement of Greek religion into Magna Graecia with the arrival of Achaean settlers in Southern Italy. Through an investigation into the proliferation of sanctuary construction in the nonurban territory of the colonies, it is evident that the sanctuaries were not only used for religious purposes, and served as symbols of the authority of the city. Metaponto, Croton, Sybaris, and Poseidonia are the colonies in question, whose systematic development relied on the construction of these sacred compounds. This study takes a twofold approach; by investigating the physical placement of sanctuaries in various areas around the chora, their functions will be extrapolated. In the Achaean colonies in Southern Italy, sanctuaries in the nonurban territory did have a sacred significance, but more importantly they demonstrated ownership over the areas they presided over, and thus aided in the delineation of the chora. Nonurban sanctuaries also held the responsibility of sustaining order amongst the outlying populations, bringing together Greeks and indigenous and serving as a mediator amongst them. Furthermore, the sanctuaries positioned at the frontiers of the territory strongly demonstrated the identity of the Greeks, reinforcing their claim to the land. Thus, dissimilar to their counterparts on mainland Greece, the sanctuaries constructed in the nonurban territory of the Achaean colonies were part of a clearly defined development plan, and serviced the political necessities of the Greeks above all.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectMagna Graeciaen_US
dc.subjectMetapontoen_US
dc.subjectSybarisen_US
dc.subjectCrotonen_US
dc.subjectPoseidoniaen_US
dc.subjectSanctuaryen_US
dc.subjectExtraurban Sanctuaryen_US
dc.subjectRural Sanctuaryen_US
dc.subjectSuburban Sanctuaryen_US
dc.subjectFrontier Sanctuaryen_US
dc.subjectcolonizationen_US
dc.subjectAchaeaen_US
dc.subjectGreek archaeologyen_US
dc.subjectchoraen_US
dc.titleSymbolism of Sovereingtyen_US
dc.title.alternativeAn Examination of the Placement and Function of Nonurban Sanctuaries in the Outlying Territories of the Achaean Colonies in Magna Graeciaen_US
dc.title.alternative800-500 BCEen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentClassicsen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SC - MA Thesis - Final Draft.docx
Open Access
SGS Thesis Submission1.34 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue