Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty of Humanities
  4. Department of Communication Studies & Media Arts
  5. Major Research Projects (MA in Communication and New Media)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/14392
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorManley, Dustin P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T18:09:59Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T18:09:59Z-
dc.date.created2012-05-08en_US
dc.date.issued2012-04-23en_US
dc.identifier.othercmst_grad_research/12en_US
dc.identifier.other1014en_US
dc.identifier.other2832528en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/14392-
dc.description.abstract<p>This study combines the fields of communication studies and psychology in order to determine the relationship between personality type, academic background, and social media content. Ten participants from each of McMaster University’s seven undergraduate faculties completed a Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) to determine their personality type, and submitted 10 personally written status updates or comments from the social media platforms of Twitter or Facebook. The Content Analysis of Verbatim Explanation (CAVE) method was used to analyze 630 social media content to determine overall positive or negative explanatory style.</p> <p>The dominant personality types at McMaster University as determined by the 70 participants are: INFP, ENFJ, and ISTJ. In type preference it was found that 68% of the participants prefer the attitude of Introversion (I), 70% prefer the perceptive function of Intuition (N), 54.3% prefer the judging function of Thinking (T), and 61.4% prefer the orientation of Judging (J). The following personality preferences were found to be correlated with the CAVE’s explanatory dichotomies: Internal/External with Sensing (S) / Judging (J), Stable/Unstable with Extraversion (E) / Sensing, Global/Specific with Sensing/Thinking, and Controllable/Uncontrollable with Sensing.</p> <p>Of the 630 submitted social media content, 68.4% of them were found describing positive events. It was found that 92.1% of the social media content contained an optimistic explanatory style. These findings strongly suggest that the majority of content written and uploaded on social media is positive and that personality type plays a minor role in content and explanations produced. It is concluded from these results that social media is an inherently positive medium for university students. The primary reason for this is believed to be a result of social media being an immensely public sphere forcing all individuals, regardless of personality type, to engage in higher levels of self-monitoring.</p>en_US
dc.subjectPositive Psychologyen_US
dc.subjectPersonalityen_US
dc.subjectMBTIen_US
dc.subjectCAVEen_US
dc.subjectMcMasteren_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectCommunication Technology and New Mediaen_US
dc.subjectEducational Psychologyen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational Communicationen_US
dc.subjectPersonality and Social Contextsen_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.titlePersonality and Positive Psychology in Social Media and Post-Secondary Educationen_US
dc.typemrp_paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Major Research Projects (MA in Communication and New Media)

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
3.7 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue