Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/14138
Title: The Reliability and Validity of the Ten Test and Exploring a New, Visual Version
Authors: Durrant, Nancy
Advisor: MacDermid, Joy
Gross, Anita
Galea, Victoria
Department: Rehabilitation Science
Keywords: Ten test;reliability;validity;visual ten test;Occupational Therapy;Other Rehabilitation and Therapy;Physical Therapy;Physiotherapy;Occupational Therapy
Publication Date: Oct-2014
Abstract: <p>Sensation threshold assessment is an important component of physical assessment. Current literature has either limited information on the clinical measurement properties of sensory threshold tests, or has demonstrated concerns in reliability, validity, responsiveness and/or clinical utility. The Ten Test (TT) is an easy and quantifiable test of moving light touch sensation requiring no equipment, however; evidence regarding its reliability and validity are limited. In this thesis, I explored the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the Ten Test. I also developed a new, visual version of the Ten Test which was assessed for concurrent validity and patient preferences. The results showed that the Ten Test has excellent test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.83 – 0.91), with acceptable minimal detectable change scores (MDC90 = 1.57 – 2.15). Ten Test scores did not correlate with current perception threshold or vibration perception threshold scores. The visual version of the Ten Test demonstrated high concurrent validity to the original version of the Ten Test (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient r = 0.74 – 0.90), and was preferred by participants (85.7%).</p>
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/14138
Identifier: opendissertations/8967
10047
5559236
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
1.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue