Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/14138
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMacDermid, Joyen_US
dc.contributor.advisorGross, Anitaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorGalea, Victoriaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDurrant, Nancyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:06:26Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:06:26Z-
dc.date.created2014-05-07en_US
dc.date.issued2014-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8967en_US
dc.identifier.other10047en_US
dc.identifier.other5559236en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/14138-
dc.description.abstract<p>Sensation threshold assessment is an important component of physical assessment. Current literature has either limited information on the clinical measurement properties of sensory threshold tests, or has demonstrated concerns in reliability, validity, responsiveness and/or clinical utility. The Ten Test (TT) is an easy and quantifiable test of moving light touch sensation requiring no equipment, however; evidence regarding its reliability and validity are limited. In this thesis, I explored the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the Ten Test. I also developed a new, visual version of the Ten Test which was assessed for concurrent validity and patient preferences. The results showed that the Ten Test has excellent test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.83 – 0.91), with acceptable minimal detectable change scores (MDC90 = 1.57 – 2.15). Ten Test scores did not correlate with current perception threshold or vibration perception threshold scores. The visual version of the Ten Test demonstrated high concurrent validity to the original version of the Ten Test (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient r = 0.74 – 0.90), and was preferred by participants (85.7%).</p>en_US
dc.subjectTen testen_US
dc.subjectreliabilityen_US
dc.subjectvalidityen_US
dc.subjectvisual ten testen_US
dc.subjectOccupational Therapyen_US
dc.subjectOther Rehabilitation and Therapyen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Therapyen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectOccupational Therapyen_US
dc.titleThe Reliability and Validity of the Ten Test and Exploring a New, Visual Versionen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRehabilitation Scienceen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science Rehabilitation Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
1.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue