Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/14127
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPirvu, Traian Aen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDavid Lozinski, Tom Hurden_US
dc.contributor.authorGambrah, Priscilla S.Nen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:06:24Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:06:24Z-
dc.date.created2014-04-30en_US
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8956en_US
dc.identifier.other10034en_US
dc.identifier.other5537594en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/14127-
dc.description.abstract<p>In this thesis we investigate portfolio optimization under Value at Risk, Average Value at Risk and Limited expected loss constraints in a framework, where stocks follow a geometric Brownian motion. We solve the problem of minimizing Value at Risk and Average Value at Risk, and the problem of finding maximal expected wealth with Value at Risk, Average Value at Risk, Limited expected loss and Variance constraints. Furthermore, in a model where the stocks follow an exponential Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, we examine portfolio selection under Value at Risk and Average Value at Risk constraints. In both geometric Brownian motion (GBM) and exponential Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (O.U) models, the risk-reward criterion is employed and the optimal strategy is found. Secondly, the Value at Risk, Average Value at Risk and Variance is minimized subject to an expected return constraint. By running numerical experiments we illustrate the effect of Value at Risk, Average Value at Risk, Limited expected loss and Variance on the optimal portfolios. Furthermore, in the exponential O.U model we study the effect of mean-reversion on the optimal strategies. Lastly we compare the leverage in a portfolio where the stocks follow a GBM model to that of a portfolio where the stocks follow the exponential O.U model.</p>en_US
dc.subjectPortfolio Optimizationen_US
dc.subjectAverage Value at Risken_US
dc.subjectRisk Managementen_US
dc.subjectValue at Risken_US
dc.subjectGeometric Brownian Motionen_US
dc.subjectMean-Reverting Modelen_US
dc.subjectFinance and Financial Managementen_US
dc.subjectOther Applied Mathematicsen_US
dc.subjectPortfolio and Security Analysisen_US
dc.subjectFinance and Financial Managementen_US
dc.titlePortfolio Optimization under Value at Risk, Average Value at Risk and Limited Expected Loss Constraintsen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMathematics and Statisticsen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
1.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue