Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13908
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorAllan, Lorraine G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTangen, Jason M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:05:34Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:05:34Z-
dc.date.created2014-01-15en_US
dc.date.issued2003-09en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8741en_US
dc.identifier.other9816en_US
dc.identifier.other4989423en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13908-
dc.description.abstract<p>Under what circumstances does knowledge of causal asymmetry and temporal delay influence causal judgements? We begin a series of thirteen experiments. by providing evidence that both high-level (causal reasoning) processes, and low-level (associative) processes influence causal assessment depending on what is asked about the events. Specifically, participants were more sensitive to causal structure in their ratings than in their prediction responses, on earlier rather than later trials, and when asked to provide an integrative causal rating. Emphasising the direction and nature of the causal relationship and the wording of the test question had no influence on participants' sensitivity to causal asymmetry. Next, we provide evidence that participants' ratings track conditional rather than uncondtional contingencies as predicted by the conditional P account as well as the Rescorla-Wagner model at asymptote. Our results suggest that participants tend to rate the influence of each cause conditional on the absence of the other cause. This tendency is not reflected by the Rescorla-Wagner model. Finally, we examine the role of temporal contiguity on judgments of contingency using a human analogue of the Pavlovian task. Our results suggest that knowledge of temporal delay modulates causal judgements.</p>en_US
dc.subjectpsychologyen_US
dc.subjectjudgementen_US
dc.subjectknowledge baseden_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.titleKnowledge-based judgements of causality: Contiguity, congruity, and direction of the causal arrowen_US
dc.typedissertationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
5.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue