Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13722
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorAllen, Barryen_US
dc.contributor.authorLong, Jingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:05:00Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:05:00Z-
dc.date.created2013-11-27en_US
dc.date.issued2004-07en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8553en_US
dc.identifier.other9628en_US
dc.identifier.other4858868en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13722-
dc.description.abstract<p>This thesis is a study of morality from the ontological point of view. I take as my main clue Heidegger's criticism of the moral interpretation of conscience in his Being and Time. This criticism enlightened me with the thought that conscience is associated with authentic existence, while morality is associated with inauthentic existence. Therefore, in this thesis morality is investigated in light of its connection to conscience.</p> <p>My main argument is that conscience is the center of the existence of the Self, while morality is based on the misunderstanding of the Self that speaks silently in conscience. Therefore, my central claim is that the movement from conscience to morality coincides with the transition from authentic to inauthentic existence. Furthermore, I show that this movement happens twice. The first movement coincides with the transition from the original existence of the Self to human existence. The second movement coincides with the transition from authentic to inauthentic (everyday) human existence.</p> <p>Although Heidegger emphasizes the importance of the call of conscience in authentic Being-one's-Self, he does not really put conscience in the center of human existence, because the principle of his ontology is the concept of Being rather than the concept of the Self Therefore, in this thesis I reinterpret his ontology in terms of the Self and base my study of morality on this reinterpretation.</p>en_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.titleConscience and Moralityen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
5.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue