Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13596
Title: The Effect of Planning and Hand Position on Hand Choice When Reaching
Authors: Garcia, Bryan Ledda Daniel
Advisor: Lyons, Jim
Tim Lee, Lawrence Grierson, Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Department: Kinesiology
Keywords: Hand Choice;Reaching;Planning;Motor Control;Motor Control
Publication Date: Oct-2013
Abstract: <p>A fundamental decision when interacting with objects in our environment involves hand selection. Two major factors that influence this choice include handedness (the proficiency of one hand over the other) and the spatial relationships perceived between the object and both effectors (Gabbard & Rabb, 2000). Previous studies have altered the location of an object in space and the complexity of a task as it relates to hand choice decisions (Bryden et al., 2003; Gabbard et al., 2003; Mamalo et al., 2006). This thesis investigates the idea of reaching toward a series of predictable target locations and its effect on the frequency of hand use when compared to unpredictable reaches. Predictable reaches allow participants to assign hand use prior to movement initiation. Participants reached to a series of 3-target sequences in one of two groups: unpredictable reaches, selecting a hand to reach each target as it appeared; and predictable reaches, where the target sequence was presented prior to initiating a reach. Unpredictable reaches at different hand positions in space demonstrate that object proximity often mediates hand choice by promoting use of the effector that affords the shortest reaching amplitude. Further, predictive reaches demonstrate a preference to complete larger reaching amplitudes earlier in the sequence in order to place both hands in a position where object proximity mediates hand choice later in the sequence. Overall, predictable reaches seem to resemble the end-state comfort effect (Rosenbaum, 1992), where participants change their approach to executing reaches when they know the sequence of targets that follows.</p>
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13596
Identifier: opendissertations/8430
9501
4690052
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
4.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue