Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13494
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMacIntyre, Normaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNegm, Ahmed M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:04:12Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:04:12Z-
dc.date.created2013-08-10en_US
dc.date.issued2013-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8325en_US
dc.identifier.other9070en_US
dc.identifier.other4417191en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13494-
dc.description.abstract<p>The purpose of this thesis was to improve the understanding of pain measurement and management in people with knee OA through: 1) Developing a theoretical model that may help in pain management and measurement; 2) Exploring the knee OA individuals’ views about three pain measures and 3) To determine if low frequency (≤100 Hz) pulsed subsensory threshold electrical stimulation produced either through pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) or pulsed electrical stimulation (PES) versus sham PEMF/PES intervention is effective in improving pain and physical function in the knee OA population.</p> <p>After pain theories literature review, a theoretical model was developed to address the gap between pain theories and clinical pain measurement and management. The patient’s views about three pain measures were not explored before 96 participants were recruited and completed the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS), Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis pain Questionnaire (ICOAP) and the Short Form-McGill Pain Quetionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2). Participants were asked how well each pain measure describes their pain on a 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (0 = does not describe your pain at all, and 10 = describes your pain completely. The time taken to complete and score the pain measure as well as the number of errors and questions while filling the pain measures were recorded. Systematic electronic searches were performed. Duplicate title, abstract and full text screening, risk of bias assessment, data extraction and grading the quality of evidence were performed. Data analysis was performed using Revman 5 software.</p> <p>Our sample of individuals with knee OA showed that VNRS, SF-MPQ-2 and ICOAP describe knee OA pain experience with no preference of one over the others. The systematic review conclusion was that PEMF/PES may be beneficial to improve physical function but not pain in people with knee OA with low and very low quality of evidence respectively</p>en_US
dc.subjectPain Measurementen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectPatient preferenceen_US
dc.subjectknee Osteoarthritisen_US
dc.subjectOrthopedicsen_US
dc.subjectOther Rehabilitation and Therapyen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Therapyen_US
dc.subjectOrthopedicsen_US
dc.titlePAIN MEASUREMENT AND MANAGEMENT IN PEOPLE WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITISen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRehabilitation Scienceen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Health Sciences (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
1.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Negm__Ahmed__Preliminaries_of_MSc_Rehabilitation_Science_thesis.docx
Open Access
37.2 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue