Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13492
Title: Comparison of Oxygen Demands and Muscle Activity Patterns During Different Forms of Body Weight Supported Locomotion in Individuals With Incomplete SCI
Authors: Fenuta, Alyssa
Advisor: Hicks, Audrey
Department: Kinesiology
Keywords: spinal cord injury;gait rehabilitation;supported walking;Other Kinesiology;Other Kinesiology
Publication Date: Oct-2013
Abstract: <p>Body weight supported devices available to enhance locomotor recovery following an incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) include treadmills with (Lokomat<sup>TM</sup>) and without (Manual Treadmill) robotic assistance, and the overground ZeroG<sup>TM</sup> system. Cardiovascular and muscular demands of these devices were compared during steady-state locomotion at the <em>same</em> level of body weight support (BWS) in 7 individuals with incomplete SCI (42.6±4.29 years) and matched able-bodied controls (CON). Questionnaires evaluated consumer preference based on walking experience. Oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>), heart rate (HR) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were expressed as percentage of peak values obtained using arm ergometry. Additionally, VO<sub>2</sub> was expressed relative to resting metabolic equivalents (METS). Filtered electromyography (EMG) signals from tibialis anterior (TA), rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF) and medial gastrocnemius (MG) were normalized to ZeroG<sup>TM </sup>stepping. Lokomat<sup>TM</sup> sessions were the least demanding in terms of oxygen uptake compared to the Manual Treadmill and ZeroG<sup>TM</sup>, and considered the least appropriate device for the SCI group’s current level of function. For SCI, the a) ZeroG<sup>TM</sup> required 3.0 METS, 54.7% of VO<sub>2</sub>peak, 84.7% of peak HR, b) Manual Treadmill required 2.8 METS, 52.9% of VO<sub>2</sub>peak, 80.8% of peak HR and c) Lokomat<sup>TM</sup> required 1.7 METS, 30.1% of VO<sub>2</sub>peak, 67.3% of peak HR. Central RPEs were 3.8, 3.7, 0.5 and peripheral RPEs were 5.1, 4.1, 0.7 for the ZeroG<sup>TM</sup>, Manual Treadmill and Lokomat<sup>TM</sup> respectively. For CON, walking required minimal effort (at most 31.5% of VO<sub>2</sub> peak), with ZeroG<sup>TM</sup> sessions requiring greater muscle activation. For SCI, muscle activation was higher in treadmill conditions compared to the ZeroG<sup>TM</sup> due to increases in TA and BF activity. The Manual Treadmill and ZeroG<sup>TM</sup> should be considered progressions following Lokomat<sup>TM</sup> training where hip extension can be encouraged using the treadmill and additional components of gait (e.g. balance, torso stability) can be focused on using the ZeroG<sup>TM</sup>.</p>
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13492
Identifier: opendissertations/8323
9462
4631419
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
6.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue