Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13492
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorHicks, Audreyen_US
dc.contributor.authorFenuta, Alyssaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:04:12Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:04:12Z-
dc.date.created2013-09-25en_US
dc.date.issued2013-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8323en_US
dc.identifier.other9462en_US
dc.identifier.other4631419en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13492-
dc.description.abstract<p>Body weight supported devices available to enhance locomotor recovery following an incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) include treadmills with (Lokomat<sup>TM</sup>) and without (Manual Treadmill) robotic assistance, and the overground ZeroG<sup>TM</sup> system. Cardiovascular and muscular demands of these devices were compared during steady-state locomotion at the <em>same</em> level of body weight support (BWS) in 7 individuals with incomplete SCI (42.6±4.29 years) and matched able-bodied controls (CON). Questionnaires evaluated consumer preference based on walking experience. Oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>), heart rate (HR) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were expressed as percentage of peak values obtained using arm ergometry. Additionally, VO<sub>2</sub> was expressed relative to resting metabolic equivalents (METS). Filtered electromyography (EMG) signals from tibialis anterior (TA), rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF) and medial gastrocnemius (MG) were normalized to ZeroG<sup>TM </sup>stepping. Lokomat<sup>TM</sup> sessions were the least demanding in terms of oxygen uptake compared to the Manual Treadmill and ZeroG<sup>TM</sup>, and considered the least appropriate device for the SCI group’s current level of function. For SCI, the a) ZeroG<sup>TM</sup> required 3.0 METS, 54.7% of VO<sub>2</sub>peak, 84.7% of peak HR, b) Manual Treadmill required 2.8 METS, 52.9% of VO<sub>2</sub>peak, 80.8% of peak HR and c) Lokomat<sup>TM</sup> required 1.7 METS, 30.1% of VO<sub>2</sub>peak, 67.3% of peak HR. Central RPEs were 3.8, 3.7, 0.5 and peripheral RPEs were 5.1, 4.1, 0.7 for the ZeroG<sup>TM</sup>, Manual Treadmill and Lokomat<sup>TM</sup> respectively. For CON, walking required minimal effort (at most 31.5% of VO<sub>2</sub> peak), with ZeroG<sup>TM</sup> sessions requiring greater muscle activation. For SCI, muscle activation was higher in treadmill conditions compared to the ZeroG<sup>TM</sup> due to increases in TA and BF activity. The Manual Treadmill and ZeroG<sup>TM</sup> should be considered progressions following Lokomat<sup>TM</sup> training where hip extension can be encouraged using the treadmill and additional components of gait (e.g. balance, torso stability) can be focused on using the ZeroG<sup>TM</sup>.</p>en_US
dc.subjectspinal cord injuryen_US
dc.subjectgait rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectsupported walkingen_US
dc.subjectOther Kinesiologyen_US
dc.subjectOther Kinesiologyen_US
dc.titleComparison of Oxygen Demands and Muscle Activity Patterns During Different Forms of Body Weight Supported Locomotion in Individuals With Incomplete SCIen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKinesiologyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MS)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
6.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue