Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13241
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorCarbotte, J.P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArora, Lal Harbansen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:03:22Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:03:22Z-
dc.date.created2013-08-30en_US
dc.date.issued1967-02en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8061en_US
dc.identifier.other9179en_US
dc.identifier.other4529908en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13241-
dc.description.abstract<p>The thermalization time of positrons in metals has been computed as a function of the electron density parameter r<sub>s</sub>, in the complete metallic electron density range (2 < r<sub>s</sub> < 5.6). Our calculations are based on the propagator technique of many body perturbation theory, to first order in the electron-positron effective force. The rate of energy loss of the positron, in our formalism, is given by the imaginary part of the self energy operator; this quantity is worked out both in the Random Phase and the Hubbard approximation. We find that, in the low momentum transfer region, which is really the only regime of importance here, the electron-positron interaction can be approximated by a screened Coulomb potential e<sup>2</sup>/r exp (-λ<sub>TF</sub>r) where λ<sub>TF</sub> is the Thomas-Fermi momentum given by √4π∝ p<sub>F</sub>. Here ∝ is related to r<sub>S</sub>, the usual density parameter, by ∝ = r<sub>S</sub>/1.919π<sup>2</sup></p> <p>Further, we find that, in general, the time taken by the positron to drop to an energy of .025 e.v. is not as short as is generally believed, although it can be said beyond doubt that complete thermalization has taken place before annihilation at room temperature. However, for aluminium at 100°k, the thermalization time is longer than the annihilation time. On the basis of this result, we suggest that this lack of thermalization in aluminium might be detectable in an experiment similar to that recently reported by Stewart and Shand (1966), concerning the positron effective mass in sodium, although without more extensive calculations it is not possible to say precisely how a small amount of non-thermalization would affect the angular correlation curves.</p>en_US
dc.subjectPhysicsen_US
dc.subjectPhysicsen_US
dc.titleThermalization Time of Positrons in Metalsen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhysicsen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
1.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue