Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13046
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRobb, Leslie A.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorChan, M.W. Lukeen_US
dc.contributor.advisorMountain, Deanen_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Dadingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:02:06Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:02:06Z-
dc.date.created2013-06-27en_US
dc.date.issued1991-06en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/7879en_US
dc.identifier.other8950en_US
dc.identifier.other4263175en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13046-
dc.description.abstract<p>Pursuing efficiency is a fundamental characteristic of economic activity. correspondingly, efficiency measurement seems an eternal interest of production economists. The present dissertation is a comparative study of alternative technical efficiency estimation methods. Two recently developed methods based on different methodologies, namely, data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the stochastic frontier approach (SF) are studied. In this dissertation we review the production and efficiency structure defined by modern production theory. Based on earlier works of Afriat, we discuss a set of propositions underpinning the non-parametric programming approach (or DEA). Further, we demonstrate the relationship between non-parametric and parametric production frontiers as references for technical efficiency measurement. We also explore the corresponding relationships between various versions of the DEA model and their implications regarding returns to scale properties. On the side of the SF approach, we work out a conditional estimation model to extract technical efficiency from a composite error structure. The main empirical contribution is a simulation study that is carried out to examine the capabilities of both approaches under various circumstances. In the first set of experiments we examine the performances of the two methods under assorted efficiency profiles, by which we describe the industry's efficiency distribution. Then, in a second set of experiments we investigate the performance of the two methods when the experimental data has different returns to scale properties. Finally, we test the robustness of the two models in regards to varied magnitudes of random noise . Our results indicate that though the SF model often leads the competit ion by a small margin i n our experimental environment, both methods have reasonable performances.</p>en_US
dc.subjectEconomicsen_US
dc.subjectEconomicsen_US
dc.titleAlternative Approaches to Technical Efficiency Estimation: A Comparative Studyen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentEconomicsen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
65.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue