Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/12809
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorTullis, S.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorLightstone, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCernick, Matthew J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:00:49Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:00:49Z-
dc.date.created2013-01-08en_US
dc.date.issued2013-04en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/7664en_US
dc.identifier.other8730en_US
dc.identifier.other3568987en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/12809-
dc.description.abstract<p>This thesis is concerned with particle subgrid scale (SGS) modeling in large-eddy simulation (LES) of particle-laden turbulence. Although most particle-laden LES studies have neglected the effect of the subgrid scales on the particles, several particle SGS models have been proposed in the literature. In this research, the approximate deconvolution method (ADM), and the stochastic models of Fukagata et al. (2004), Shotorban and Mashayek (2006) and Berrouk et al. (2007) are analyzed. The particle SGS models are assessed by conducting both a priori and a posteriori tests of a periodic box of decaying, homogeneous and isotropic turbulence with an initial Reynolds number of Re=74. The model results are compared with particle statistics from a direct numerical simulation (DNS). Particles with a large range of Stokes numbers are tested using various filter sizes and stochastic model constant values. Simulations with and without gravity are performed to evaluate the ability of the models to account for the crossing trajectory and continuity effects. The results show that ADM improves results but is only capable of recovering a portion of the SGS turbulent kinetic energy. Conversely, the stochastic models are able to recover sufficient energy, but show a large range of results dependent on Stokes number and filter size. The stochastic models generally perform best at small Stokes numbers. Due to the random component, the stochastic models are unable to predict preferential concentration.</p>en_US
dc.subjectlarge-eddy simulationen_US
dc.subjectparticle-laden turbulenceen_US
dc.subjectparticle subgrid scale modelingen_US
dc.subjectapproximate deconvolution methoden_US
dc.subjectstochastic modelingen_US
dc.subjectcomputational fluid dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectFluid Dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectFluid Dynamicsen_US
dc.titleParticle subgrid scale modeling in large-eddy simulation of particle-laden turbulenceen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Applied Science (MASc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
4.93 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue