Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/10732| Title: | The Ethical Generalization Argument |
| Authors: | Rullman, Irving Robert |
| Advisor: | Najm, Sami |
| Department: | Philosophy |
| Keywords: | Philosophy;Philosophy |
| Publication Date: | Oct-1968 |
| Abstract: | <p>This thesis examines the ethical generalization argument from a methodological point of view. The generalization is not considered in a historical (Kantian) I sense of deductive implication, but rather in a more I empirical fashion of behavoristic investigation. The argument, its: limitations, and other attendant problems are analyzed.The final recommendations combine several I approaches within and without standard philosophical procedure.</p> |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/10732 |
| Identifier: | opendissertations/5759 6780 2138171 |
| Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| fulltext.pdf | 3.77 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
