The Ethical Generalization Argument

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/10732

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.advisor	Najm, Sami	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Rullman, Irving Robert	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2014-06-18T16:52:25Z	-
dc.date.available	2014-06-18T16:52:25Z	-
dc.date.created	2011-08-08	en_US
dc.date.issued	1968-10	en_US
dc.identifier.other	opendissertations/5759	en_US
dc.identifier.other	6780	en_US
dc.identifier.other	2138171	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11375/10732	-
dc.description.abstract	<p>This thesis examines the ethical generalization argument from a methodological point of view. The generalization is not considered in a historical (Kantian) I sense of deductive implication, but rather in a more I empirical fashion of behavoristic investigation. The argument, its: limitations, and other attendant problems are analyzed.The final recommendations combine several I approaches within and without standard philosophical procedure.</p>	en_US
dc.subject	Philosophy	en_US
dc.subject	Philosophy	en_US
dc.title	The Ethical Generalization Argument	en_US
dc.type	thesis	en_US
dc.contributor.department	Philosophy	en_US
dc.description.degree	Master of Arts (MA)	en_US
Appears in Collections:	Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
fulltext.pdf Open Access	3.77 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open