Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/9706
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Shepherd, D.M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Paul, G.M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Garratt Oldham David | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-18T16:48:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-18T16:48:05Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2011-06-16 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 1970-10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | opendissertations/4804 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 5824 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2063626 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/9706 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>In the Introduction it is shown that, although the Commentariolum purports to have been written in early 64 B.C. by Quintus Cicero, it is more llkely that the author was a writer of historical character writing (prosopopoiia) from the first century A.D..</p> <p>This is not a critical edition: the text used is departed from only in sections nine and twenty eight, and then not radically.</p> <p>The Commentary is intended to make reference to the Commenariolum as simple as possible: it tells the reader what the text probably means, if necessary, and if its evidence is supported or contradicted.</p> <p>The only radical departure from conventional interpretation is in part of chapter ten.</p> | en_US |
dc.subject | Classics | en_US |
dc.subject | Classics | en_US |
dc.title | [Q. Ciceronis] Commentariolum petitionis: A Commentary with a Discussion of Authenticity | en_US |
dc.type | thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Classics | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Arts (MA) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
fulltext.pdf | 11.55 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.