Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/9255
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLevy, B.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWithey, John Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:46:23Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:46:23Z-
dc.date.created2011-06-01en_US
dc.date.issued1978en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/4395en_US
dc.identifier.other5416en_US
dc.identifier.other2042190en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/9255-
dc.description.abstract<p>There is considerable evidence indicating that speech information plays a part in visual information processing. To translate visual input into a speech code would require some sort of speech recoding stage. One technique widely used to verify the existence of this speech recodinq stage has been the vocal suppression paradigm, where the translation stage is presumed to be interfered with by concurrent irrelevant vocal activity. However, attempts have been made to explain the vocal suppression effect in terms of general cognitive capacity overload, without recourse to speech-specific interference. This thesis represents an attempt to implicate the existence of speech recoding by demonstrating that vocal suppression is, in fact, attributable to interference with subvocal activity.</p> <p>Three experiments are reported. The first indicates that subjects, given control over the rate at which sentences are presented to them, do not choose to read more slowly in an attempt to overcome the vocal suppression effect. The second experiment indicates that even when forced to read at a slower rate, subjects cannot overcome the effect. The final experiment indicates that the suppression effect can occur with a non-verbal interference task. The results are discussed in terms of the distinction between general and speech-specific interference.</p>en_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.titleVocal Suppression: The Effects of Processing Time and the Nature of the Subsidiary Tasken_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
2.98 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue