Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/9225
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLyons, Jamesen_US
dc.contributor.authorD'Amore, Aliciaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:46:16Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:46:16Z-
dc.date.created2011-06-01en_US
dc.date.issued2009-09en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/4367en_US
dc.identifier.other5386en_US
dc.identifier.other2041462en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/9225-
dc.description.abstract<p>The Illusion of Control (Langer, 1975) refers to individuals' misperceptions of control in chance situations. Little, however, is known regarding how illusions of control influence motor control and action planning. The purpose of this experiment was to examine the strength of the illusory control effect and, whether the strength of this effect influenced the degree to which traditional stimulus-response (S-R) associations were learned. Participants were required to make a series of virtual dice rolls by pressing on a force transducer. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: congruent, incongruent, and control. Groups differed on the basis ofthe S-R pairs presented. The congruent group was presented with hypothetically congruous S-R pairs (high force generation = high dice outcomes and vice versa) whereas the incongruent group was presented with the reversed S-R pairs. The control group was presented with arbitrary dice outcomes, independent of force generation. The primary measures of interest were Peak Force and Impulse. When individuals were presented with incongruous S-R pairings, or random dice outcomes, no differences were found in the maximum force exerted, regardless of the outcome requested (e.g. high or low). However, when congruous S-R pairs were presented, force generation was found to be higher when a high number was requested, while the opposite was observed when a low outcome was assigned. Results suggest that participants may use outcome dependent strategies when generating virtual dice rolls.</p>en_US
dc.subjectKinesiologyen_US
dc.subjectKinesiologyen_US
dc.titleStacking the Odds: Illusion of Control Influences Stimulus-Response Compatibility in a Discrete Motor Tasken_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKinesiologyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MS)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
3.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue