Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/8844
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRobinson, J.E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLatham, Andrewen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:44:11Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:44:11Z-
dc.date.created2011-03-24en_US
dc.date.issued1988-02en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/4014en_US
dc.identifier.other5031en_US
dc.identifier.other1899335en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/8844-
dc.description.abstract<p>The central argument of this paper is that efforts to rationalise the European defence industrial base are both pre-requisite to and incompatible with the broader goal of Alliance wide specialisation and rationalisation, at least withiin NATO as it is presently configured. Broadly, the contention is that rising weapons costs in the context of stable or shrinking defence budgets are moving the NATO alliance toward structural disarmament. In response to this trend, the Alliance has been forced to consider means of reforming the highly wasteful defence industrial effort so that the price of military preparedness can be kept within reasonable limits. From a simple economic perspective, the creation of a NATO-wide free-trade regime in defence goods wold seem to be the optimal approach to this program. Free trade, however, is fraught with political hazards that make it largely unacceptable to most Alliance governments.</p> <p>An apparently attainable alternative to free trade in this connexion is "managed specialisation." Managed specialisation, however, also has its limitations. Put simply, in order to rationalise the Allied development and production effort, Europe must first of all "get itself together" and begin producing competitive equipment at competitive prices. In order to achieve this, however, Europe must reform its own domestic market in order to realise US-scale production economies and capitalisation rates. The crux of the problem is that this necessarily requires greater European collaboration and protectionism, and ultimately suggests that Europe will begin to offer the US more global competition. As this is unlikely to sit well with the Americans, it would seem that--contrary to the original intent--European rationalisation seems destined to result in more, not less, fracture within the Alliance defence industrial base. Although the verdict is not yet final, the Eurofighter programme would seem to confirm this hypothesis.</p>en_US
dc.subjectMaterials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectMaterials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.titleNATO in the 1990's: Conflict and Competition over the Defence Industrial Base--The Case of the European Fighter Aircraften_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMaterials Scienceen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
3.33 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue