Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/8713
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorJan, Y.-h.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTsui, Pui-ming Bartholomewen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:43:45Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:43:45Z-
dc.date.created2011-02-09en_US
dc.date.issued1982en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/3896en_US
dc.identifier.other4913en_US
dc.identifier.other1773972en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/8713-
dc.description.abstract<p>This thesis is an analysis of Li Ch'un-fu's ([characters removed]) chief extant work, the Ming-tao-chi shuo ([characters removed] Discussions of the "Collected Plaints on Tao") Two foci have arisen from this book. The first is the defence of Buddhism from Neo-Confucian criticisms. The second is a theory of harmonization of the Three Teachings. Li's involvement with the first earned him the more widely known reputation of being a defender of Buddhism while his contribution to harmonization has often been neglected. Our study has shown that Li's life-work had been harmonization and that the defence of Buddhism should be regarded as an intermediate step towards the identity of the Three Teachings.</p> <p>The chief accusation of Neo-Confucianists is that Buddhism neglects involvement with worldly affairs, customs and human relationships. Li's reply is that from the point of view of Mahayana, one should not and could not make a distinction between religious practice and worldly affairs, between the Absolute and the phenomenal, between Nirvāna and samsāra. Hence, the Buddhist does not neglect worldly affairs. Then, Li turns around and say that this Buddhist truth is exactly what Confucianism and Taoism teach originally. In order to substantiate his claim, he draws parallels of the main philosophical and cultivational concepts from each tradition. The guiding principles of interpretation of these parallels have often been taken from Buddhism. Among these principles, the most important has been the identity of the Absolute Truth and the worldly truth. Thus, the Mahāyāna teaching of Truth provides the structure on which Li maps out Chinese concepts and from this mapping an identity of the Three Teachings comes into view. Compared to previous theories of harmonization, Li's is the most elaborate and provides a most outstanding example of how an harmonizer attempts to find an intellectual unity among the divergent traditions he has inherited.</p>en_US
dc.subjectReligionen_US
dc.subjectReligionen_US
dc.titleLi Ch 'un-fu and His Discussions of the "Collected Plaints on Tao"en_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentReligious Studiesen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
17.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue