Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/8385
Title: The peripheral vision of normal children and of children treated for cataracts
Authors: Bowering, Elizabeth Rose Mary
Advisor: Maurer, Daphne
Department: Psychology
Keywords: Psychology;Psychology
Publication Date: Feb-1992
Abstract: <p>I assessed the development of peripheral vision and the effects thereon of deprivation. First, I examined the visual field in 28 5-year-olds, 24 6-year-olds, 20 7-year-olds, and 16 adults using kinetic perimetry with the Goldmann perimeter and a 6.4' light of either 31.8 cd/m² or 318 cd/m². Five-year-olds saw as far superiorly as did the group of older subjects. But even at 7 years of age, children did not see as far temporally or inferiorly as did adults. When the 5-year-olds were retested at 7 years, their fields had grown and were as large as those of the original 7-year-olds. I also examined sensitivity across the field in 20 7-year-olds, 20 8-year-olds, 12 9-year-olds, and 20 adults using static perimetry with the Octopus perimeter and a 25.8' light which varied in intensity from 0 to 1000 asb. Sensitivity in the near, mid, and far periphery was adultlike by 7 years of age, with later development at 0° centrally. Children treated for dense and central cataracts were assessed identically except that the deprived eye was focused for the testing distance by a contact lens. Each deprived eye exhibited a restricted field, especially temporally, and a less sensitive field, especially at 0° centrally. More restricted fields were found for children with longer than with shorter deprivation, except superiorly, and for children with monocular than with binocular deprivation, at least for tests with the dim light. Less sensitive fields at 0° centrally were found for children with developmental than with congenital deprivation. Finally, only children with unilateral congenital deprivation exhibited larger losses at 20° nasally than at 30° temporally. Control experiments indicated that the losses of peripheral vision could be explained only partly by optical factors. The results indicate that the development of peripheral vision continues throughout childhood, at least for tests using a small stimulus. Deprivation affects peripheral vision, especially those parts of the field slowest to develop (e.g., the temporal field, 0° centrally, and the near nasal field). It is likely that the underlying pathways are not mature until after 5 years of age.</p>
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/8385
Identifier: opendissertations/3594
4611
1663727
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
7.98 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue