Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/7864
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorO`Connor, Maryen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, Jeanette Barbaraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:40:47Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:40:47Z-
dc.date.created2010-08-13en_US
dc.date.issued1993-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/3114en_US
dc.identifier.other4130en_US
dc.identifier.other1443944en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/7864-
dc.description.abstract<p>This thesis investigates nineteenth- and twentieth-century medical discourse in treatises and texts written by doctors, and women's resistance to it in novels by Charlotte Bronte, Virginia Woolf, and Margaret Drabble. My analysis involves what is said and not said in medical texts; what other discourses influence medicine; the authority of the medical writer; and the power of the institution of medicine. I extend Foucault's theory of the formation of medical discourse by looking beyond madness to physical pathology, and by including issues of gender.</p> <p>Women's novels, particularly in the nineteenth century, must do all the work of the larger canon of writing available to men. Until recently, women could not write back against medical discourse in text books or scientific journals: fiction was their primary genre. Patricia Yaeger suggests that much American feminist work has encouraged acceptance of "the inevitability of women's disempowerment" rather than revealing "the woman writer's powers of protest and change." Building on Yaeger's work, I explore the discursive possibilities of Bronte, Woolf and Drabble rather than their limitations.</p> <p>I investigate the narrative strategies which enable both an outward silence which sounds like acquiescence, and an inward voice which actively resists the social constructions of medical discourse. The novels all feature doctors as imposing characters, all portray the power medicine wields, and all address the social implications of medical discourse on the construction of women. There is a progression in narrative methodology moving from apparent silent acquiescence to medical power in Villette, through couched derision against medicine in Mrs Dalloway, to open verbal resistance to medical authority in The Millstone. My analysis concentrates on the discourse of resistance formed by women writers against the discourse of medicine. This response slowly moves from an emphasis on silence towards the acquisition of voice.</p>en_US
dc.subjectEnglish Language and Literatureen_US
dc.subjectEnglish Language and Literatureen_US
dc.titleSilence and Patients: Resisting Medical Discourse in Bronte, Woolf and Drabbleen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentEnglishen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
7.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue