Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/7728
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorCampbell, Dugalen_US
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Allen Kenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:40:17Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:40:17Z-
dc.date.created2010-08-04en_US
dc.date.issued1994-04en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/2985en_US
dc.identifier.other3994en_US
dc.identifier.other1425620en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/7728-
dc.descriptionCompliance has been defined as "...the extent to which a person's behavior coincides with medical or health advice" (Haynes, 1978, pp. 1-2) and is an important area of research in behavioral medicine. There are several key issues involved in compliance research. Specifically these are: 1) How do we define and measure compliance?; 2) how can we predict compliance?; and 3) does compliance lead to a better outcome than does noncompliance? This dissertation focuses on the question of what does psychology have to contribute to our understanding of these issues? The first study investigated the amount of agreement between the various definitions of dietary compliance in patients on hemodialysis. It demonstrated that one reason why there is so little agreement on the factors that predict compliance is that researchers in this area define compliance in very different ways. The second study explored the possibility of using outcome to provide an objective definition of compliance. It was found that dietary compliance is not related to outcome for hemodialysis patients. The third study focused on the use of self-efficacy to predict compliance in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, a condition where dietary compliance may be easily measured. The results suggested that gender differences influenced the predictive power of self-efficacy. The interaction between gender and self-efficacy was confirmed in a laboratory task as well. Much of the experimental research on dieting and weight regulation ignores the potential impact of gender differences. The results of these studies suggest other paths for future research and also demonstrate that psychology can make a valuable contribution to research on compliance with chronic dietary regimens.en_US
dc.description.abstracten_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.titleCompliance with Chronic Dietary Regimens: Measurement, Prediction, and Outcomeen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
4.98 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue