Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/7499
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSimpson, Evanen_US
dc.contributor.authorRaghunath, T.R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:39:31Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:39:31Z-
dc.date.created2010-07-25en_US
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/2773en_US
dc.identifier.other3803en_US
dc.identifier.other1408490en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/7499-
dc.description.abstract<p>This dissertation is a study of Aurobindo's theory of human development and its metaphysical foundations. I argue that in accordance with his affirmation of the priority of metaphysics, Aurobindo builds his theory of human development on the basis of his system of metaphysics, and that, therefore, an understanding of his metaphysics is indispensable. I claim that the core of his metaphysics is constituted of seven theories: 1) the theory of Brahman, 2) the theory of Supermind, 3) the theory of Involution, 4) the theory of Supraphysical Worlds and Beings, 5) the theory of Evolution, 6) the theory of Rebirth, and 7) the theory of Human Nature. I then deal with some issues pertaining to these theories. In Part II, I offer a reconstruction of Aurobindo's theory of the stages of human development and his developmental model. I clarify his descriptions of the higher stages of development and provide illustrations of the types of states consciousness corresponding to them. I also extract his hitherto unrecognised developmental model from his numerous observations on the course of development and compare it with the standard model derived from the work of Piaget and Kohlberg. I argue that Aurobnido's model is a better model and refer to some recent criticisms of the Piaget-Kohlberg model. I conclude that although Aurobindo has linked his theory of human development to his metaphysics such that if we accept his metaphysics we are bound to accept the major claims of his theory of human development, the two can be delinked, and that his theory of human development can be evaluated independently of his metaphysics by reference to historical and cross-cultural data on spiritual development.</p>en_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.titleMetaphysics and Human Development, A Study Of Aurobindo's Theory of Human Developmenten_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophyen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
10.77 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue