Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/7428
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLyons, Denisen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlleyne, Curtis Brianen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:39:19Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:39:19Z-
dc.date.created2010-07-21en_US
dc.date.issued1976-12en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/2707en_US
dc.identifier.other3718en_US
dc.identifier.other1403282en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/7428-
dc.description.abstract<p>This thesis is a report of the evaluation of laboratory utilization by a Family Practice Clinic. The evaluation covered the month of October, 1975. All encounter forms generated by patient visits in October were included in the study sample.</p> <p>The encounter form records whether a patient is new to the clinic, the nature of his visit, whether the visit is the first for a given problem or a follow-up visit, the diagnosis made at the visit, and any laboratory procedure ordered. These variables were combined in an instrument that determined the motive a physician might have for ordering a laboratory investigation.</p> <p>Three motives for ordering a laboratory procedure were defined, ie. casefinding, monitoring or diagnostic use. Tests requested were classified into the three categories. The classification instrument was validated and shown to be reliable. The data used from the encounter was shown to be only 50% reliable with unrecorded information being the major factor contributing to the unreliability of the data.</p> <p>The study showed that requests for laboratory procedure can be classified by the three motives for requesting them, ie. diagnosing, casefinding or monitoring. Sixty-one percent of the tests were used for diagnosis, 11% for casefinding and 28% for monitoring. Age, sex, nature of visit and the diagnosis of the patient were shown to be important variables in explaining the physician's use of the laboratory.</p> <p>The results indicate that the classification logic is an operational tool but in this study its validity has not been completely assured.</p>en_US
dc.subjectMedical Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectMedical Sciencesen_US
dc.titleAn Analysis of Laboratory Utilization in a Family Practice Uniten_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMedical Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MS)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
4.95 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue