Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/7129
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorReinhartz, Adeleen_US
dc.contributor.authorWebster, Suzanne Janeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:38:15Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:38:15Z-
dc.date.created2010-07-08en_US
dc.date.issued2001-02en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/2420en_US
dc.identifier.other3503en_US
dc.identifier.other1386733en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/7129-
dc.description.abstract<p>The Gospel of John often uses ingesting language. First, it refers to concrete elements of food and drink (such as bread, water, fish and wine) and the actions of eating and drinking. Second, it uses metaphors of food and drink; for example, Jesus is the "bread of life" and the "source of living water." Third, it uses meals as the setting for much of the narrative. The prevalence of ingesting language in various contexts and genres establishes it as a primary literary motif in the Gospel of John. While the individual passages involving food, drink and ingesting have not gone unnoticed in the history of Johannine scholarship, no major monograph has addressed the motif as a whole nor drawn specific conclusions about its function in the Gospel. Drawing on the literary theory of William Freedman, this study first extends the limits of the ingesting motif to include phrases drawn from the semantic domain of ingestion as well as narrative contexts that have been excluded, for the most part, from previous studies. By extending these limits, this study affirms more emphatically the relationship between eating and drinking and the death of Jesus. In particular, ingesting language provides a way to describe both the role of Jesus as the one who is incarnate as "flesh" but who must die in order that others might eat and live, and the role of the believer who is "to eat and drink Jesus." This study will thus argue that the ingesting motif serves as a vehicle for Johannine soteriology. This conclusion has implications for the extended debate concerning Eucharist traditions in the Johannine literature, for although the Eucharist is not specifically mentioned in the Gospel, the prevalence of the ingesting motif suggests that eating and drinking play a significant role in the Johannine understanding of salvation.</p>en_US
dc.subjectReligionen_US
dc.subjectReligionen_US
dc.titleIngesting Jesus: Eating and drinking in the Gospel of Johnen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentReligious Studiesen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
8.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue