Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/7044
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMilliken, Bruceen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarczinski, Anne Cecileen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:37:52Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:37:52Z-
dc.date.created2010-07-02en_US
dc.date.issued2001-07en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/2340en_US
dc.identifier.other3390en_US
dc.identifier.other1380318en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/7044-
dc.description.abstract<p>The research reported in this thesis focuses on the cognitive processes that contribute to the repetition effect in a forced-choice discrimination task. The five experiments reported in the first manuscript suggest that the repetition effect is determined by two separate memorial influences. One influence is specific to the link between perception and action while the other influence reflects the prior action independent of the perceptual stimulus to which that action was made. The critical observation is that these two influences, specific and nonspecific, can work in concert or in opposition to modulate the repetition effect. The four experiments reported in the second manuscript focus on how these two processes, specific and nonspecific, change with age. There are two critical findings reported in this second manuscript: (1) the relative contribution of these two influences changes with age and (2) manipulating the testing time in young adults appears to be an excellent model for the study of aging. A further contribution of this thesis is that it illustrates the danger in assuming that repetition effects are process pure cognitive measures. Instead, it may be more appropriate for cognitive psychologists to focus on analytic techniques that allow the influence of separate processes on performance to be studied.</p>en_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.titleSeparate specific and nonspecific influences on the repetition effect: Implications for agingen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
4.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue