Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/6002
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBrowne, Reginaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Nancy E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:33:51Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:33:51Z-
dc.date.created2010-04-28en_US
dc.date.issued2003-09en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/1339en_US
dc.identifier.other2359en_US
dc.identifier.other1291233en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/6002-
dc.description.abstract<p>Experiencing hardship, suffering and loss and finding a way to learn from one's experiences rather than being overtaken, diminished and embittered by them, constitutes an inevitable human challenge. Yet surprisingly, little has been written about the structure of the experience of adversity. Equally astounding is the fact that although there is considerable knowledge about the personality traits and behavioral patterns of people who are resilient in adversity, little is known bout how people actually construct meaning in such a situation. Part of the reason for this missing knowledge may be the prevailing dominance of quantitative methods in health research. Although these methods are useful for revealing factors associated with positive patterns of adaptation they are less adequate in revealing both the structure of human experience as wen as the practices that humans engage in to make sense of their world.</p> <p>By describing and analyzing the shared lived experiences of twenty ~five people who have lived through a situation of adversity, as wen as the practices they engaged in to recover meaning, and the meanings they gave to their experience, this hermeneutical phenomenological study uncovers new knowledge related to the structure of adversity. In doing so knowledge is gained about how personal coherence can be preserved under extreme conditions. In particular, the study unfolds the structure of adversity in terms of three key themes - turning, dwelling and caning. In addition, the practices that people engage in as ways of dwelling amidst adversity are discussed. Ways of dwelling are thus compared and contrasted to reveal those that call forth, or alternatively conceal, authentic possibilities in life. In order to clarify the existential and ontological challenges at stake in situations of adversity, the philosophical frameworks ofKierkegaard, Heidegger, Marcel and Gadamer are brought into a converging dialogue with the stories and conversations gathered for this study. Inferences for health professionals in general, and nurses in particular are drawn. These inferences are offered in consideration of the professional commitment to care for people during times when meaning breaks down and when the presence or absence of human solicitude and caring has far reaching implications.</p>en_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.titleFinding Meaning in Adversityen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNursingen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
9.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue