Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Student Publications (Not Graduate Theses)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32586
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Bie, Lee-
dc.contributor.authorMichetti-Wilson, Emily-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-24T16:50:26Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-24T16:50:26Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/32586-
dc.description.abstractIn the past decade, peer support has been rapidly scaled and spread within mainstream healthcare settings without due concern and protection of its core values, contributing to a political, legal, and ethical problem referred to as “peer support drift” or co-optation. Over 2022-2024, PeerWorks consulted with peer supporters across the province of Ontario to develop a position statement and call to action on addressing this problem. This statement elaborates the conditions contributing to peer support drift, which include how many peer supporters are precariously employed in inhospitable workplace environments incongruent with peer support values (e.g., use of illness models, labeling, coercion); face workplace disrespect and exploitation as people who belong to equity-deserving groups; and have minimal access to equitable or adequate funding, resources, and opportunities for learning, as compared to other health disciplines. These workplace conditions can pressure peer supporters to deviate from their core values and towards inappropriate clinical (e.g., managing medications) or purely instrumental tasks (e.g., making coffee, driving clients to appointments). When values-based peer support is practiced with integrity, it has a unique ability to bridge gaps in the healthcare system, address the unmet needs of marginalized people, and reduce stigma and isolation through the rebuilding of relationships and community. However, when peer support drifts from its special role and duplicates conventional health services, we are deprived of these health equity-enhancing possibilities, harming health systems, society, and peer supporters. The position statement ends with 12 recommendations for collective, properly resourced prevention and intervention led by people with lived experience.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPeerWorksen_US
dc.subjectpeer supporten_US
dc.subjectco-optationen_US
dc.subjectpeer driften_US
dc.subjectMad Studiesen_US
dc.subjectpeer support values and ethicsen_US
dc.subjectlived experienceen_US
dc.subjectscope of practiceen_US
dc.subjectrole clarity/driften_US
dc.subjecthuman rightsen_US
dc.subjectemployment standardsen_US
dc.subjectepistemic injusticeen_US
dc.subjectmoral injuryen_US
dc.subjectableismen_US
dc.subjectconsumer/survivor/ex-patient movementen_US
dc.titleDrift from Peer Support Values and Standards: A Position Statement and Call for Actionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSocial Worken_US
Appears in Collections:Student Publications (Not Graduate Theses)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Drift from Peer Support Values and Standards.pdf
Open Access
3.51 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue