Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32506
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDiLiberto, Deborah-
dc.contributor.authorOlawusi, Ladi Florinda-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-09T15:55:30Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-09T15:55:30Z-
dc.date.issued2025-11-20-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/32506-
dc.descriptionThis thesis examines how perceived risk of infection and disease severity, barriers to vaccine access, lack of information, sense of duty to community, and trust in vaccines, health systems and governments can influence vaccine hesitancy among health workers in fragile health systemsen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: According to the World Health Organization, vaccine hesitancy is one of the top 10 threats to global health. Health workers (HWs) are essential to epidemic preparedness in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), but vaccination rates are still low. This study compared the factors that influence health workers' reluctance to get the Mpox and COVID-19 vaccines in Kinshasa Province using the 5C framework and looked at how they relate to infection prevention and control (IPC) measures. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey of 403 HWs across two health districts, Maluku I and Lingwala, representing rural and urban regions respectively was used. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression were used to analyze data on sociodemographics, information sources, IPC practices, and 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination. Results: The findings revealed that hesitancy was higher for COVID-19 (73%) compared to Mpox (47%). For both vaccines, confidence and complacency were significant barriers, influenced by skepticism regarding vaccine safety, fear about side effects, and a diminished perception of risk. However, notable differences were observed. Physicians exhibited considerably greater hesitancy regarding COVID-19 compared to nurses, while no significant variation by health worker category was observed hesitancy towards Mpox. Dependence on international mass media was associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, whereas national media promoted acceptance. Regardless of stance on vaccination, the majority of health workers in this study acknowledged the significance of IPC measures, indicating that social responsibility, perceived risk and trust influence vaccine acceptance in Kinshasa more so than general preventive attitude. Conclusion: In the face of emerging diseases like Mpox and COVID-19, addressing factors that determine vaccine hesitancy among HWs through targeted communication and integrated approaches to improve vaccine uptake can strengthen future pandemic preparedness and endemic disease management, positioning HWs as core drivers of vaccination strategies that reinforce health systems and protect communities.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectVaccineen_US
dc.subjectEmerging diseasesen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectMpoxen_US
dc.subjectVaccine Hesitancyen_US
dc.subjectDR Congoen_US
dc.titleDETERMINANTS OF COVID-19 AND MPOX VACCINE HESITANCY AMONG HEALTH WORKERS IN KINSHASA PROVINCE, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGOen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentGlobal Healthen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractVaccination is among the most effective ways of preventing illnesses, and yet some health workers are not willing to be vaccinated. This study explored why health workers in Kinshasa Province, Democratic Republic of Congo, are hesitant to take COVID-19 and Mpox vaccines. Based on survey answers from 403 healthcare providers, the research used the "5C" framework exploring the significance of confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation, and collective responsibility on vaccine decisions. It further examined how COVID-19 and Mpox vaccine hesitancy intersects with infection-control habits such as masking, distancing, and hand washing. The study showed that hesitancy to COVID-19 vaccines was higher than Mpox. Confidence, complacency, and source of information had a significant impact on decision-making. Most health workers valued infection-prevention practices regardless of vaccine stance. These findings can guide global health leaders to develop precise communication and build trust to strengthen pandemic preparedness, safeguarding health workers, and protecting communities they serve.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Olawusi_Ladi_F_Finalsubmission202509_MSc Global Health.pdf
Open Access
1.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue