Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32458
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWilson, Joanna-
dc.contributor.advisorTaylor, Lisa-
dc.contributor.authorSalole, Jac-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T17:24:29Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-01T17:24:29Z-
dc.date.issued2025-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/32458-
dc.description.abstractThere is an increasing demand for new approach methods that refine, reduce, and replace vertebrate animal use in toxicity testing. A major source of vertebrate use is whole-effluent toxicity (WET) testing, which uses an estimated 3 million fish in North America each year. The rainbow trout acute lethality test is the most common WET test method and is widely applied in routine compliance testing making it an ideal candidate for replacement. The RTgill-W1 assay is a potential replacement that exposes rainbow trout gill cells to effluent and evaluates toxicity using fluorescent indicators. This thesis investigates if the RTgill-W1 assay is a viable alternative to the rainbow trout acute lethality test. Optimizations to the RTgill-W1 assay to improve performance monitoring and reduce assay cost by 40 to 75%. The ability of the RTgill-W1 assay to pulp and paper effluent toxicity was evaluated thoroughly using 70 effluent samples. One of three fluorescent indicators used in the RTgill-W1 assay is strong influenced by unionized ammonia in effluents. As ammonia is a common component of effluent samples, this indicator was suggested to be omitted in regulatory frameworks. Of the effluents evaluated, 20 caused acute lethality to fish and all 20 caused toxicity in the cell line. The calculated effect meaures had a strong correlation, suggesting that cell viability can predict fish lethality for pulp and paper mill effluents. An additional 3 samples were toxic to the cells but not the fish, suggesting the RTgill-W1 assay may be more sensitive to effluent toxicity. Regulatory frameworks for the implementation of the RTgill-W1 assay are presented estimated to reduce fish use by ~ 90% for pulp and paper mill effluents. Overall, these results are promising for the implementation of the RTgill-W1 assay as a replacement to the rainbow trout acute lethality test for pulp mill effluents.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectnew approach methods (NAMs), pulp and paper effluent, whole-effluent toxicity, bioassayen_US
dc.titleTHE APPLICATION OF THE RTGILL-W1 CELL LINE ASSAY TO DETECT PULP AND PAPER MILL EFFLUENT TOXICITYen_US
dc.title.alternativeDETECTING EFFLUENT TOXICITY WITH THE RTGILL-W1 ASSAYen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBiologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractThere is a societal desire to refine, reduce, and replace vertebrate animal use in science. A large number of vertebrates are used in toxicity tests for the regulation of effluent that enters ecosystems. One of the most common toxicity tests in North America is the rainbow trout acute lethality test, which uses millions of fish annually. This thesis investigates the RTgill-W1 assay, an alternative approach using rainbow trout gill cells that can be cultured indefinitely without using fish. Optimizations of the RTgill-W1 assay reduced assay cost by 40–75%. To evaluate assay capability, 70 effluent samples were evaluated, with 50 compared to the fish lethality test. All 20 effluents causing fish lethality also reduced cell viability in the gill cells. As results were consistent across test methods, the RTgill-W1 assay is recommended as a replacement for the acute lethality test.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Salole_Jack_C_202509_MSc.pdf
Embargoed until: 2026-09-23
5.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue