Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32380
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Macedo, Luciana | - |
dc.contributor.author | Almeida de Oliveira, Lisandra | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-24T14:30:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-09-24T14:30:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32380 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) is a major global cause of disability. While exercise is a recommended treatment, the relative effectiveness of different approaches and the influence of psychosocial factors remain unclear. This thesis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and clinical equivalence of graded activity compared to other exercise interventions, and to explore how psychosocial factors contribute to recovery. Three studies were conducted. A Cochrane systematic review found very low certainty evidence from three trials (401 participants) that graded activity may not provide meaningful improvements in pain, disability, or psychosocial outcomes when compared to no trial treatment. Given that the evidence is very uncertain, future studies may lead to different conclusions. A large equivalence randomized controlled trial (425 participants) showed that graded activity and motor control exercises were equally effective in reducing physical disability, pain intensity, and physical function, with no significant differences in adverse events. Further, a longitudinal mixed- methods study followed 10 participants who received graded activity and identified five distinct recovery trajectories. Participants with higher optimism, self-efficacy, and lower fear of movement reported better outcomes and sustained engagement. In contrast, those with psychological distress, unhelpful beliefs, or contextual barriers experienced limited benefit. These findings suggest that graded activity may be a valid treatment option for chronic LBP, with similar effectiveness to motor control exercises. However, psychosocial factors may influence individual trajectories of LBP recovery. Although graded activity incorporates personalized functional goals, individuals facing significant psychological or contextual challenges may require additional support to substantially benefit from exercise-based interventions. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | back pain | en_US |
dc.subject | exercise | en_US |
dc.subject | graded activity | en_US |
dc.title | UNDERSTANDING AND EVALUATING THE ROLE OF GRADED ACTIVITY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Rehabilitation Science | en_US |
dc.description.degreetype | Dissertation | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) | en_US |
dc.description.layabstract | This thesis looked at how well graded activity works for managing chronic low back pain and how psychological and social factors influence recovery. It includes three chapters: (1) a review of past research on graded activity showed that it is still unclear whether the intervention works better than doing nothing at all; (2) a large clinical trial showed that graded activity and another type of exercise called motor control exercises were equally helpful in reducing pain and disability; (3) a year-long interview study with 10 people found that personal beliefs, emotions, and life circumstances played a big role in how and when people reported improvements. People who were more optimistic about life and confident in managing their pain showed greater improvement. In contrast, those who felt anxious, had negative beliefs about their back, were undergoing emotional distress, or were going through difficult life events found it more challenging to benefit from the intervention. Graded activity may be a valid treatment option and can be chosen based on personal preference. However, people dealing with emotional or social difficulties may need extra support to get better results. | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
AlmeidadeOliveira_Lisandra_finalsubmission2025.09_PhD.pdf | 7.72 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.