Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32358
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Forbes, Allauren Samantha | - |
dc.contributor.author | Turnbull, Sarah Jessica | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-23T15:42:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-09-23T15:42:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32358 | - |
dc.description.abstract | While feminism is a remarkably powerful tool in recognizing and addressing the harms women face, many individuals are quick to suggest abandoning feminism altogether. So often, feminism faces harsh opposition from outsiders. A comprehensive analysis reveals that the issue lies not in the word but in how feminism is conceptually understood. Historical manifestations, factionalization, and negative stereotypes have all clouded understandings of feminism. For starters, historical manifestations of feminism, such as women's education, suffrage, and reproductive autonomy, shape current understandings. These manifestations, however, exclude marginalized women for the social gain of white, upper-class women. As well, feminism has become exceptionally factionalized; each faction has its own meaningful conception of what feminism is, but the number of conceptions eclipses an understanding of feminism. Negative stereotypes have also tainted feminism as a concept such that outsiders have concepts of feminism as 'man-hating' and 'feminazi'. While untrue, these stereotypes have penetrated public conceptions of feminism. Each of the three issues reveals justified motivation for abandoning feminism. Abandoning feminism certainly removes the aforementioned shortcomings, however, in doing so, women also lose the tool through which they are able to recognize and address the harms they face. Instead of abandoning feminism, I propose a conceptual re-engineering project which aims to ameliorate the harmful shortcomings while working at developing a meaningful, useful concept of feminism. A conceptual re-engineering project promises to evaluate how feminism is understood, identify the cracks in feminism's conceptual foundation, and to repair the cracks by developing an ameliorative concept. Simply put, I will argue for and develop a concept of feminism that avoids harmful shortcomings previously presented while continuing to preserve the spirit of feminism. Rather than abandon feminism, this project marks an effort to develop a meaningful, useful concept of feminism. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | Feminism | en_US |
dc.subject | Conceptual Re-Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject | Feminist Philosophy | en_US |
dc.title | The Scarlet F: A Conceptual Re-Engineering of Feminism | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Arts (MA) | en_US |
dc.description.layabstract | Feminism is a powerful tool which allows women to recognize the harms they face, and provides an account of how to address these harms. While feminism is the driving force behind sociopolitical gains for women, it has become marked by excluding marginalized women, by splitting into many branches each with their own understanding of feminism, and by harmful negative stereotypes such as 'man-hating' and 'feminazi'. Feminism has lost its structural integrity; we no longer understand what feminism is or how to engage with it. This project reflects one of the first efforts to evaluate feminism as a concept, highlight its shortcomings, and propose the need for a revised concept. I propose an ameliorative concept of feminism that avoids harmful shortcomings and offers a clearer, more meaningful understanding of feminism. | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Turnbull_Sarah_J_FinalSubmission_2025September_MA.pdf | 856.17 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.