Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32357
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorKim, Joseph-
dc.contributor.advisorSana, Faria-
dc.contributor.authorMa, Yutian-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-23T15:37:34Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-23T15:37:34Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/32357-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explored the individual and combined effects of two well-established memory-enhancing strategies: the generation effect and the self-reference effect. A total of 89 undergraduate participants completed sentence completion tasks that manipulated both generative tasks (generate vs. read) and personal relevance through the use of second-person possessive pronouns (“your” vs. “their”). Memory performance was assessed using both free and cued recall tasks to evaluate how these encoding strategies operate across different forms of relational memory. A 2x2 mixed ANOVA revealed a main effect of generation, with the generation condition recalling significantly more items than the read condition across both memory tests. A smaller but statistically significant main effect of self-reference was also observed, with items from sentences with self pronouns (“your”) being recalled significantly more than items from sentences with other pronouns (“their”). This suggests that even minimal linguistic cues can elicit enhanced encoding when linked to the self. Importantly, the interaction between generation and self-reference was not significant, indicating that these strategies provide additive benefits and can be used concurrently without interference. An exploratory analysis revealed that the generation effect was significantly larger in cued recall compared to free recall, possibly due to stronger cue-target associative encoding. These results contribute to our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of memory and support the practical application of combining generative learning with personalized language. The findings have implications for educational and cognitive training contexts, where both strategies may be integrated to enhance memory performance in a variety of learners.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectMemoryen_US
dc.subjectCognitionen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectGenerationen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Referenceen_US
dc.titleINTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE GENERATION AND SELF-REFERENCE EFFECTSen_US
dc.title.alternativeTHE INTERACTIONS OF GENERATION AND SELF-REFERENCEen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractThis study investigated two well established strategies for improving memory: the generation effect, where information is better remembered when individuals produce it themselves, and the self-reference effect, which enhances memory by relating information to oneself. We asked participants to complete sentence fragments like “Your glass contained your ___” or “Their glass contained their ___” using either self-related or other-related wording. We also compared how well they remembered the sentences using two types of memory tests: free recall (remembering as much as you can) and cued recall (remembering with hints). We found that generating answers significantly improved memory. We also found that using “your” instead of “their” also gave a small boost to memory, showing that even subtle language cues can make information feel more personal and therefore more memorable. Interestingly, these two strategies didn’t interfere with each other, meaning people can use both at the same time to provide unique benefits to learning. These findings have practical implications for education and communication, demonstrating that both active engagement and subtle shifts in language can meaningfully enhance memory.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ma_Yutian_2025Aug_Msc.pdf
Open Access
697.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue