Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32332
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Meade, Maureen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lucas, Amanda | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-19T18:18:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-09-19T18:18:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32332 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background It has been proposed that barriers related to consent for deceased organ donation and organ donation research have stymied efforts to advance outcomes. This thesis explores these two related, but different contexts of consent with the aim of elucidating potential impact on the organ donation and transplantation system. Objectives 1. Assess knowledge and attitudes towards opt-out consent in deceased organ donation. 2. Assess the impact of opt-out consent on deceased organ donation. 3. Describe transplant recipients’ views on organ donor research and their role in consent to this research. Methods Study 1: Meta-synthesis systematic review assessing knowledge and attitudes towards the opt-out model of consent in deceased organ donation. Study 2: A systematic review assessing the effect of the opt-out model of consent in deceased organ donation on quantitative outcomes. Study 3: A qualitative interview study to elucidate views of transplant recipients on organ donor research and their role in research consent. Results Study 1: We found limited knowledge and support for opt-out consent. We identified important ethical considerations about opt-out consent among members of the public, including value for autonomy in decision-making and the right to informed consent. Study 2: We found a weak signal that countries with the opt-out model have higher consent to donation rates and higher organ donation rates. Study 3: Among solid organ transplant recipients, we found that while preferences varied related to the method and timing of providing consent for use of their own data, participants did not feel they had a role in research consent of a donor patient. Conclusions This thesis highlights that while opt-out consent may be associated with improved donation outcomes, public understanding and support for such policies remain limited. Findings from this thesis also challenge assumptions about transplant recipients’ roles in donor research. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | organ donation | en_US |
dc.subject | consent | en_US |
dc.subject | organ donation research | en_US |
dc.subject | consent | en_US |
dc.title | Exploration of Consent Issues in Deceased Organ Donation | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Health Research Methodology | en_US |
dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) | en_US |
dc.description.layabstract | Ongoing demand for donated organs has led to legislating changes to consent for donation and conducting research trials to increase the quantity and quality of organs available for transplant. In this thesis, we explored two areas previously viewed as barriers to these strategies, consent for research and consent for donation. In study one, a systematic review, we showed that knowledge and attitudes towards opt-out consent were limited and there are important considerations that should be explored. In study two, another systematic review, we showed that jurisdictions with opt-out consent may have higher donation rates. In study three, a qualitative exploration, we concluded that views about requiring transplant recipients to have a role in consenting to donor research may not be suitable. The findings of this thesis can serve to inform consent practices in organ donor research and in healthcare systems. | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lucas_Amanda_N_finalsubmission202509_PhD .pdf | final thesis pdf | 2.06 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.