Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32267
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPhoenix, Michelle-
dc.contributor.authorReitzel, Meaghan-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-29T17:46:22Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-29T17:46:22Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/32267-
dc.description.abstractFamily-centred pediatric rehabilitation services have widely accepted benefits related to a child’s functioning and participation. However, some families experience barriers to accessing and engaging with these services. Families have identified that organizational policies and models of service delivery can impact their experiences with pediatric rehabilitation services. There is a paucity of research focusing on how policies and service delivery models impact access and engagement in Ontario’s publicly-funded pediatric rehabilitation services. Furthermore, there is a gap in the evidence related to recommendations for potential modifications to these structures to enhance access and engagement in these services. The first objective of this thesis is to critically examine policy in publicly-funded pediatric rehabilitation services to understand its impact on access to services. The second objective is to use co-design methodology to improve models of service delivery, with a focus on telerehabilitation, to improve access and engagement in pediatric rehabilitation services. These objectives are achieved through the research outputs of this thesis including recommendations supporting the development of inclusive discharge policies (Chapter 2) and co-created solutions aimed at enhancing experiences with pediatric telerehabilitation (Chapters 3 and 4). Findings from the critical discourse analysis of discharge policies in Chapter 2 emphasized the importance of taking an ethical and family-centred approach to policy development that authentically includes and amplifies family voices. Chapters 3 and 4 used co-design methodology engaging caregivers, clinicians and pediatric rehabilitation service managers to develop solutions focused on improving the 3C’s of communication, consistency and connection to enhance access and engagement with pediatric telerehabilitation services. The findings of this thesis call policy-makers and pediatric rehabilitation service organizations to extend the provision of family-centred service beyond the point of care to include authentic engagement of families in the development of policies and service delivery models.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectpediatric rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectservice accessen_US
dc.subjectservice engagementen_US
dc.subjectpolicy analysisen_US
dc.subjectcritical discourse analysisen_US
dc.subjectco-design methodologyen_US
dc.subjectmodels of service deliveryen_US
dc.subjectfamily centred serviceen_US
dc.titleREIMAGINING POLICY AND MODELS OF SERVICE DELIVERY TO ENHANCE ACCESS AND ENGAGEMENT IN PUBLICLY FUNDED PEDIATRIC REHABILTATION SERVICESen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRehabilitation Scienceen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeCandidate in Philosophyen_US
dc.description.layabstractFamily-centered care in children’s rehabilitation helps children take part in everyday life. But some families have a hard time getting to and using these services. Families have said that rules and the way services are set up can make things harder. Right now, we do not know much about how things like discharge rules or online therapy (telerehabilitation) can help families get connected and stay connected with children’s rehabilitation services. This thesis looks at research and ideas to show why we should change how services are offered, so they are easier for families to use. It also gives examples of how these systems can be improved by including the voices of families in how they are designed. People in positions to make rules, lead organizations, or do research can use these ideas to create better, family-friendly services.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
reitzel_meaghan_k_2025august_PhD.pdf
Open Access
5.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue