Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32204
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorCarlesso, Lisa-
dc.contributor.authorJafarzadeh Harzand, Vahideh-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-22T20:09:55Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-22T20:09:55Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/32204-
dc.description.abstractKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability among older adults, and education is a key in supporting self-management. However, how information is presented can significantly influence how people understand and manage their condition. This thesis employed a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a qualitative component to assess the feasibility and preliminary effects of two educational interventions, Pain Science Education (PSE) and Standard Biomedical Education (SBE), in older adults with knee OA. It explored physiological, psychological, emotional, and cognitive responses, and examined feasibility to inform the design of a future large-scale trial. Thirty-seven adults with knee OA were randomized to receive either neuroscience-informed PSE or traditional SBE via custom-built websites. Feasibility outcomes were largely met, except for assessment burden, indicating that only minor modifications are needed before conducting a full-scale trial. Preliminary findings suggest the PSE group showed more favorable trends, including improved parasympathetic regulation, greater knee OA knowledge, and better function and pain outcomes. A qualitative study was also conducted to explore participants’ emotional and cognitive responses to the educational materials through think-aloud and debriefing interviews. Thematic analysis of 18 transcripts (nine per group) revealed four key themes: motivated to move, knowledge and support, sentiments and self-recognition, and perspectives on surgery. Participants exposed to PSE expressed greater hope, reassurance, and motivation, while those in the SBE group described distress and a sense of inevitable decline. These differences highlight how the framing of OA education, empowering vs. impairment-focused, can shape beliefs, emotions, and self-management. In conclusion, this thesis shows that PSE is feasible and potentially more effective than SBE for a number of knee OA outcomes supporting the need to shift from a biomedical explanation of knee OA toward a more contemporary understanding that promotes engagement and self-management in OA care. en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectKnee OA, Pain Science Education, Mixed Methods, Pilot Standard Biomedical Education, Osteoarthritisen_US
dc.titleThe Impact of Educational Style on Physiological and Psychosocial Markers in People With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Mixed-Methods Pilot RCTen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRehabilitation Scienceen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science Rehabilitation Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractKnee osteoarthritis (OA) can cause pain and limit mobility. Education about OA can help manage symptoms, but how this information is shared affects how people understand and cope with their condition. This thesis looked at two types of knee OA education. One used a traditional medical view that links pain to joint damage. The other, called Pain Science Education (PSE), teaches that pain is affected by your nerves, thoughts, and feelings. We tested both types, looked at participants’ physical and emotional responses, then interviewed them about their experiences. Those who received PSE felt more hopeful and confident managing their pain. In contrast, those given the traditional explanation often felt discouraged or fearful of worsening symptoms. These findings suggest that PSE may better support people in understanding their pain and staying engaged in self-care. Some changes are needed to improve the study design before a larger trial is done. en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Jafarzadeh Harzand_Vahideh _ 202508_MSc.pdf
Embargoed until: 2026-08-22
1.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue