Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32013
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorAyers, Paul W.-
dc.contributor.authorAl Nabulsi, Abdul Rahman-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-21T19:18:15Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-21T19:18:15Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/32013-
dc.description.abstractChemical concepts such as electronegativity and chemical hardness, initially defined before the advent of computational quantum chemistry, remain central to interpreting and guiding experimental chemistry. While modern computational methods yield vast numerical data, translating these outputs into chemically intuitive concepts remains essential. This thesis evaluates fundamental reactivity rules derived from conceptual density functional theory—specifically, the Maximum Hardness Principle (MHP), Minimum Electrophilicity Principle (MEP), and the |∆μ| Big is Good (DMB) rule—using a computationally generated dataset of approximately half a million diatomic acid–base double-exchange reactions. Benchmarking revealed that MHP and MEP reliably predict reaction outcomes, particularly under conditions aligning with the hard/soft acid–base classification and moderate bond stretching. In contrast, the DMB principle exhibited considerable sensitivity to atomic reference-state choices, bond distances, and the nature of participating elements, clearly limiting its broad practical applicability. This limitation prompted a reconsideration of the widely accepted relationship between electronegativity and electronic chemical potential, μ = −χ, motivating the development of a novel electronegativity scale. Addressing these challenges, a new electronegativity scale was developed via a graph-theoretic approach, representing intramolecular charge transfers as a directed, weighted graph. Using a minimum feedback-arc set (MFAS) ranking method combined with manifold-learning techniques, this scale provides a numerically stable, chemically intuitive electronegativity ranking. The resulting scale closely aligns with established values for main-group elements and demonstrates robustness when extended to heavier atoms. Importantly, this methodology is readily extendable beyond atomic species, enabling future studies to accurately quantify the electronegativities of functional groups and ions, broadening its utility in mechanistic studies and rational chemical design.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectconceptual density functional theoryen_US
dc.subjectmaximum hardness principleen_US
dc.subjectminimum electrophilicity principleen_US
dc.subjectchemical reactivity predictionsen_US
dc.subjectdouble-exchange reactionsen_US
dc.subjectelectronic chemical potentialen_US
dc.subjectelectronegativityen_US
dc.subjectDiatomic acid–base exchangeen_US
dc.subjectHard/Soft Acid-Base principle (HSAB)en_US
dc.subjectcharge-transfer reactionsen_US
dc.subjectGraph-theoretic rankingen_US
dc.subjectMinimum Feedback Arc Seten_US
dc.subjectComputational quantum chemistryen_US
dc.titleInferring Molecular Descriptors and Chemical Reactivity Rules from Diatomic Molecular Dataen_US
dc.title.alternativeInferring Chemical Concepts from Diatomic Molecular Dataen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentChemistry and Chemical Biologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Al Nabulsi_Abdul Rahman_2025June_MSc.pdf
Embargoed until: 2026-06-24
30.72 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue