Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32013
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Ayers, Paul W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Al Nabulsi, Abdul Rahman | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-21T19:18:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-07-21T19:18:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32013 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Chemical concepts such as electronegativity and chemical hardness, initially defined before the advent of computational quantum chemistry, remain central to interpreting and guiding experimental chemistry. While modern computational methods yield vast numerical data, translating these outputs into chemically intuitive concepts remains essential. This thesis evaluates fundamental reactivity rules derived from conceptual density functional theory—specifically, the Maximum Hardness Principle (MHP), Minimum Electrophilicity Principle (MEP), and the |∆μ| Big is Good (DMB) rule—using a computationally generated dataset of approximately half a million diatomic acid–base double-exchange reactions. Benchmarking revealed that MHP and MEP reliably predict reaction outcomes, particularly under conditions aligning with the hard/soft acid–base classification and moderate bond stretching. In contrast, the DMB principle exhibited considerable sensitivity to atomic reference-state choices, bond distances, and the nature of participating elements, clearly limiting its broad practical applicability. This limitation prompted a reconsideration of the widely accepted relationship between electronegativity and electronic chemical potential, μ = −χ, motivating the development of a novel electronegativity scale. Addressing these challenges, a new electronegativity scale was developed via a graph-theoretic approach, representing intramolecular charge transfers as a directed, weighted graph. Using a minimum feedback-arc set (MFAS) ranking method combined with manifold-learning techniques, this scale provides a numerically stable, chemically intuitive electronegativity ranking. The resulting scale closely aligns with established values for main-group elements and demonstrates robustness when extended to heavier atoms. Importantly, this methodology is readily extendable beyond atomic species, enabling future studies to accurately quantify the electronegativities of functional groups and ions, broadening its utility in mechanistic studies and rational chemical design. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | conceptual density functional theory | en_US |
dc.subject | maximum hardness principle | en_US |
dc.subject | minimum electrophilicity principle | en_US |
dc.subject | chemical reactivity predictions | en_US |
dc.subject | double-exchange reactions | en_US |
dc.subject | electronic chemical potential | en_US |
dc.subject | electronegativity | en_US |
dc.subject | Diatomic acid–base exchange | en_US |
dc.subject | Hard/Soft Acid-Base principle (HSAB) | en_US |
dc.subject | charge-transfer reactions | en_US |
dc.subject | Graph-theoretic ranking | en_US |
dc.subject | Minimum Feedback Arc Set | en_US |
dc.subject | Computational quantum chemistry | en_US |
dc.title | Inferring Molecular Descriptors and Chemical Reactivity Rules from Diatomic Molecular Data | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Inferring Chemical Concepts from Diatomic Molecular Data | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Chemistry and Chemical Biology | en_US |
dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Science (MSc) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Al Nabulsi_Abdul Rahman_2025June_MSc.pdf | 30.72 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.