Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/31883| Title: | COVID-19 living evidence profile #4 (version 4.1): What went well and what could have gone better in the COVID-19 response in Canada, as well as what will need to go well in future given any available foresight work being conducted? |
| Authors: | Waddell, K Wilson, MG Bain, T Bhuiya, AR Al-Khateeb, S Sharma, K DeMaio, P Lavis, JN |
| Keywords: | COVID-19;response;future;foresight;work |
| Publication Date: | May-2021 |
| Citation: | Waddell KA, Wilson MG, Bain T, Bhuiya A, Al-Khateeb S, Sharma K, DeMaio P, Lavis JN. COVID-19 living evidence profile #4 (version 4.1): What went well and what could have gone better in the COVID-19 response in Canada, as well as what will need to go well in future given any available foresight work being conducted? Hamilton: McMaster Health Forum, 14 May 2021. |
| Series/Report no.: | LEP 4.1; |
| Abstract: | An overview of the best available research evidence from around the world (i.e., evidence syntheses) and local research evidence (i.e., single studies) and, if applicable, a scan of experiences from other countries and from Canadian provinces and territories, about what went well and what could have gone better in the COVID-19 response in Canada, as well as what will need to go well in future given any available foresight work being conducted in response to a decision-maker’s request. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/31883 |
| Appears in Collections: | Living evidence profile |
Files in This Item:
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
