Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/31770
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorNoseworthy, Michael D.-
dc.contributor.authorSimard, Nicholas-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-04T19:08:36Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-04T19:08:36Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/31770-
dc.description.abstractDiffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) is a powerful tool for assessing microstructural integrity in both healthy and diseased populations. However, variations due to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vendor differences and demographic factors must be quantified to improve clinical utility. This study integrated three analyses: (1) consistency of DTI-derived metrics across vendors using a DTI calibration phantom, (2) age, sex, region, and vendor-related differences in DTI metrics in a large healthy control population, and (3) an application of ‘Big Data’ DTI to perform outlier detection in the cerebellum of a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patient population. The calibration phantom study evaluated consistency of the acquisition of a rank-2 diffusion tensor. DTI metrics, primarily fractional anisotropy (FA), a measure of white matter integrity, was evaluated across three MRI vendors (GE, Siemens, Philips). No significant differences in FA were found between vendors (p > 0.05, 1.3% differences), suggesting that DTI-derived metrics are reliable and reproducible in a phantom environment across scanner vendors. Compared to a study using a large dataset of healthy controls (n = 2,700), significant variability effects (p < 0.0001) were found to be associated with specific demographic and vendor factors. The main findings included a significant decline in FA due to aging, which we expected, sex differences with FA being overall greater in males (p < 0.0001), regionally, the tapetum section of the corpus callosum exhibited the highest variability across subjects, and all three vendors had significantly different FA values from each other. This was the first ‘Big Data’ study that evaluated subject age, sex, and MRI vendor all in one statistical model. This important advancement allowed for assessment of interactions between these variables. A final study compared microstructural abnormalities in the cerebellum of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients (n = 51), to an age, sex, and vendor matched control group (n = 150 per matched group), while performing a case-wise two-tailed Z-score outlier analysis. This revealed unique cerebellar FA reductions, particularly in males (n = 24), and older populations (56-60 yrs) appeared more likely to have numerous cerebellar regions affected (i.e. n > 8 ROIs). Linear regression, random forests, and hierarchical clustering analysis further revealed the importance of Z-score analysis compared to its Post Concussion Symptom Score (PCSS) counterpart. These findings highlight the clinical utility of ‘Big Data’ DTI but also demonstrates the need for vendor harmonization tools such as ComBAT and underscores age, sex, and vendor related DTI differences. This study also shows that investigating neuropathology through a ‘Big Data’ DTI lens can demonstrate novel findings in understanding mTBI such as cerebellar vulnerability. Future work should focus on developing standardized harmonization pipelines, while also leveraging machine learning approaches and targeting regions of interest like the corpus callosal tapetum or the cerebellum to enhance the detection of subtle neuropathological changes in mTBI.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectMRI, DTI, Big Data, mTBIen_US
dc.titleASSESSING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DIFFUSION TENSOR VARIABILITY IN HEALTHY SUBJECT ’BIG DATA’en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentElectrical and Computer Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeCandidate in Philosophyen_US
dc.description.layabstractDiffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a type of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan that is a key tool for studying brain microstructure. Importantly, this type of data is widely available in open-source neuroimaging data repositories from all over the world. Many researchers now use these sources of Big Data with new machine learning (ML) approaches to provide unparalleled sensitivity to answer key brain research questions. However, to use these large data sources researchers need to understand and control for sources of variability that could contaminate results and would necessitate larger data requirements. This thesis focused on evaluating variability in ’Big Data’ DTI across demographic factors (age and sex) and technical factors (regions of interest (ROIs) and MRI vendor). Our research found that under controlled conditions, using a locally developed and manufactured quality assurance standard (called an MRI phantom), there were no technical differences. However, biological differences between 2,700 healthy individuals based on age, sex, and vendor differences significantly increased the variability of DTI metrics. This work provides evidence that when controlling for age, sex, and MRI vendor the use of healthy control ‘Big Data’ can allow personalized subject-specific structural analyses that can ultimately be used to identify effects in the brain due to neurological conditions.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Simard_Nicholas_M_2025_PhD.pdf
Embargoed until: 2026-06-04
120.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue