Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/31460
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorCarter, Tristan-
dc.contributor.advisorRoddick, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorMoir, Rose-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-02T14:23:39Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-02T14:23:39Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/31460-
dc.description.abstractDiscussions of depositional practices have been widely researched and discussed in archaeological discourse (Richards and Thomas 1984; Thomas 1999, 2012; Whittle et al. 1999; Chapman 2000a; Pollard 2002; Pearce 2008; Hatzaki 2009; Beadsmoore et al. 2010; Garrow 2012; Hughes 2014; Hofmann 2020). In this thesis I will contribute to these global discussions by detailing the deposition of the pottery assemblage from the Freston causewayed enclosure (Suffolk, UK), an Early Neolithic (EN) monument dating to the 4th millennium cal. BC. Following contemporary studies of fragmented assemblages (Joyce 2015) I use the term ‘itineraries’ in an attempt to show how pot sherds can carry a multiplicity of meanings associated with various contexts, despite often being understudied due to their lack of diagnostic qualities or wholeness and seen as less useful for studies (Arnoldussen and de Vries 2019; Gaydarska 2023: 115). I first detail the pottery by employing a multi-attribute analysis to characterize the assemblage and categorize pots into distinct ware groups in order to identify particular itineraries. Further, I discuss how the ditches of a causewayed enclosure, and the enclosure itself followed diverse histories as the groups of people who built and used these spaces throughout c. 500 years of Freston’s use. To do this I examine in detail the stratigraphic sequences (i.e., phases) of the ditches. I show that depositional practices were consistent through time, and initiated by the cleaning and maintenance of these features, which were then followed by depositing both whole and fragmented objects. I propose that these depositional events mark durable memories of the lineages responsible for the digging and maintenance of ditches, and the repeated patterns of deposition representing various object itineraries of ritually-significant objects.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectEarly Neolithicen_US
dc.subjectBritish Prehistoryen_US
dc.subjectCeramic Analysisen_US
dc.subjectObject Itinerariesen_US
dc.titleGathering Itineraries: Reconstructing Depositional Practices at an Early Neolithic Causewayed Enclosure in Eastern Britainen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnthropologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Moir_Rose_E_2025March_MA.pdf
Embargoed until: 2026-03-31
73.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue