Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/31290Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | Aldinckle, R.F. | - |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lang, H.W. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Forsman, Rodger | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-03T13:43:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-03T13:43:17Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1964-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/31290 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The word myth appears frequently in contemporary theological and exegetical writing. Unfortunately, it is used with a variety of meanings by different authors, and this gives rise to the layman's general misunderstanding of what is really a technical term. This thesis is an essay in the clarification of the notion of myth, through the use of the techniques of logical analysis of language. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.subject | Myth | en_US |
| dc.subject | Language | en_US |
| dc.title | Myth and Language | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Divinity College | en_US |
| dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
| dc.description.degree | Master of Philosophy (MA) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Digitized Open Access Dissertations and Theses | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forsman_Rodger_EW_REWF_1965May_MA.pdf | 3.23 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
