Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30953
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Bock, Nicholas | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kovacheff, Maya | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-27T15:45:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-27T15:45:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30953 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a recurrent and chronic mood disorder. BD type I (BD-I) is associated with high disability, lower quality of life, and excess mortality. Importantly, BD is also associated with severe functional impairment. Staging models suggest BD is a progressive illness and use episode recurrence and functional impairment in euthymia as main proxy measures. Research has identified deficits in functioning in BD compared to healthy controls (HC) and suggest that impairment may be sustained in periods of euthymia and related to episode recurrence. The current research uses data from a larger longitudinal neuroimaging study to investigate psychosocial and subjective cognitive function, as measured by the Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST) and the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), in individuals with BD-I who experienced an episode relapse (BDR) compared to those who did not (BDNR) and healthy controls (HC). Methods: Participants completed up to 3 visits over 2 years, that took place approximately 1 year apart. The final sample consisted of 61 HC, 21 BDR, and 26 BDNR participants. Three analyses were conducted to explore between and within-subject differences: mixed-effects analysis of variance (ANOVA), one-way Kruskal-Wallis tests, and simple linear growth analyses. Missing data precluded using three time points for some analyses, so the mixed-effects ANOVA and one-way Kruskal-Wallis tests used two re-binned timepoints (baseline and follow-up) and the growth curve analysis used all three timepoints. Results: Significant differences were found between the HC group and both BD groups (BDR and BDNR) for both the FAST and CFQ at baseline and follow-up visits. No significant differences were found between the BDR and BDNR groups, neither differences at timepoints nor differences in change across timepoints. The BDNR group demonstrated a significant decrease in CFQ scores over the 3 timepoints. Conclusion and Future Directions: The results suggest that individuals with BD-I experience sustained impairment in psychosocial and subjective cognitive function over time compared to HC, but relapse does not have a significant effect on this impairment. Since the BDNR group demonstrated a decrease in CFQ scores over time, not experiencing relapse may be implicated in the improvement of subjective cognitive functioning. Future studies with longer measurement windows and larger sample sizes could further clarify these findings. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | bipolar disorder | en_US |
dc.subject | longitudinal | en_US |
dc.title | RELAPSE IN THE LONGITUDINAL TRAJECTORY OF FUNCTIONING IN BIPOLAR DISORDER TYPE I | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Psychology | en_US |
dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Science (MSc) | en_US |
dc.description.layabstract | Bipolar disorder type I (BD-I) is a debilitating mood disorder involving manic episodes (e.g. heightened mood, excessive energy, impulsivity) and oftentimes depressive episodes as well (e.g. low mood, little interest in activities, sleep problems). BD-I is associated with high rates of functional impairment. Some models suggest that BD-I is a progressive illness wherein a longer duration of illness, a higher number of mood episodes, and lingering impairment at times outside of mood episodes can be indicators of the illness getting worse overtime and affecting individuals more negatively. Using data from a larger study, the current study aimed to investigate functional impairment in individuals with BD-I who experienced an episode relapse (BDR) compared to those who did not (BDNR) and healthy controls (HC). Two measures of function were used: psychosocial functioning was measured by the Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST) and subjective cognitive functioning was measured by the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ). Participants completed up to 3 visits over 2 years, spaced approximately 1 year apart. Differences between both BD groups and the HC group were found for both scales, suggesting a sustained functional deficit in BD over time. No differences between the BDR and BDNR groups were found, but the BDNR group demonstrated improvement in subjective cognitive functioning over the 2-year period. These findings suggest that BD-I shows impairment in psychosocial and subjective cognitive functioning as compared to HC but that relapse status did not have an effect. This research suggests that perhaps mood episode relapse may not influence functioning negatively, but a lack of relapse may have positive effects on subjective cognitive functioning. | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kovacheff_Maya_B_FinalSubmisson2024December_MSc.pdf | 1.2 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.