Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30905
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorClark, David L.-
dc.contributor.authorShields, Rachel-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T19:54:55Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-21T19:54:55Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/30905-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis theorizes new meanings of “motherhood” in a series of fictional texts that exemplify a mother-child relationality rooted in concepts typically seen as inimical to “good” mothering: indifference, impersonality, and inhumanity. To do so, I draw primarily upon the work of the queer theorist and critic Leo Bersani, who has sought across his oeuvre to develop a mobile and wide-ranging vocabulary to describe ways of being in the world that eschew our most fundamental belief in ourselves as the possessors of unique identities. For Bersani, this belief in the “sanctity of the self” (The Culture of Redemption 4) is the purest expression of a relationality that is rooted in possession, of both self and other; it therefore makes violence, broadly conceived as acts of appropriation, the primary means by which we approach the world. The self who is self-possessed and who grasps at the world is driven by the desire for knowledge, and Bersani names the implacable desire for knowledge—for the possession of the other’s difference through the process of coming to know—epistemophilia. In this thesis, I critically examine a series of fictional representations of the mother-child relation in order to critique the ways in which motherhood is implicated, in the first instance, in the reproduction of this kind of possessive, epistemophilic, and inherently violent selfhood. I argue that our deeply held belief in the necessity of “maternal love”, the mother’s recognition of the precious singularity of the child and her pledge to protect and nurture it, is in fact an expression of epistemophilia and, hence, constitutes a fundamental violence. I also suggest that there are aspects of motherhood that make a radically new relationality possible; a motherhood without maternity names the scandalous possibility of a mother who fails to see the “sanctity” of her child’s, and her own, selfhood. This “failed” motherhood is the prism through which the following literary analyses take speculative form. Ultimately, this thesis pursues new ways of thinking about motherhood that both delink it from its conservative reproductive role and unfold new relational potentialities within it. The illumination of these non-normative, non-pathological potentialities—of indifference, impersonality, and inhumanity—represents an important contribution to that vein of critical theory that seeks to valorize the antisocial as a means of pursuing new and nonviolent ways of being.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBersanien_US
dc.subjectMaternityen_US
dc.subjectCritical Theoryen_US
dc.subjectSelfhooden_US
dc.subjectEpistemologyen_US
dc.titleAfter Bersani: On the Scandal of Mothers Without Maternityen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentEnglish and Cultural Studiesen_US
dc.description.degreetypeDissertationen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.description.layabstractIn contemporary Western culture, motherhood names an identity and a relationality that are heavily normative and that uphold a disciplined and disciplining concept of “maternal love”. This thesis argues that the standard of “maternal love”, which imagines the mother-child relation as intensely singular and passionately invested in the unique personality of the child, is a primary means by which the value of individualism is reproduced. In order to critique this model of motherhood and the version of selfhood that it supports, I draw primarily upon the work of Leo Bersani, a queer theorist and critic who sought across his works to de-emphasize the “sanctity of the self” and thereby de-emphasize the violence of the individual self who will go to great lengths to protect its borders and the “seriousness of its statements”. Specifically, in this thesis I examine fictional representations of the mother-child relation and explore how they help us imagine an alternative to the violence of individualism. By putting Bersanian theory in conversation with motherhood, a category that has largely been undertheorized in Bersani’s oeuvre, I suggest that there are ways to think about motherhood that delink it from its role in reproducing individualism and that make possible new relational modes rooted in “antisocial” concepts such as indifference, impersonality, and the inhuman.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Shields_Rachel_H_finalsubmission2024December_PhD.pdf
Open Access
1.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue