Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30894
Title: Making the Case for Virtual Osteoarthritis Management Programs
Authors: Van Damme, Jill Kathleen
Advisor: Carlesso, Lisa
Department: Rehabilitation Science
Keywords: osteoarthritis;telerehabilitation
Publication Date: 2024
Abstract: Rationale: Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of Canada’s most prevalent chronic conditions, resulting in a high burden of disease due to common symptoms of chronic pain, limited function, poor mental health, and decreased quality of life. First-line treatments for OA target pain and quality of life through education, exercise, and weight loss. However, many individuals do not participate in first-line approaches, and known barriers exist to in-person formats. Virtual osteoarthritis management programs (OAMP) have the potential to improve access to treatment and address barriers to in-person formats. Objectives: To understand virtual OAMP that include education and exercises by examining the GLA:DTM Canada transition to virtual formats. The objectives are to: 1) Identify and synthesize available guidance for implementing virtual programs 2) Understand participant and clinician perspectives on virtual GLA:DTM 3) Compare GLA:DTM program outcomes between in-person and virtual or hybrid formats Results: Objective 1: A scoping review demonstrated limited guidance available (six peer-reviewed, six grey literature) for clinicians implementing virtual programs. Collectively guidance suggested clinician training, adjustments to consent, education and exercise components, and completing participant screening and safety checks. Objective 2: Participants’ and clinicians’ perspectives were obtained via qualitative descriptive analysis and identified four main themes: 1) expected and unexpected benefits, 2) drawbacks to virtual programs, 3) program delivery in a virtual world, and 4) shifting and non-shifting perspectives. Overall, participants supported virtual formats, while clinicians remained divided. Objective 3: When compared to virtual formats there were no differences between in-person and virtual/hybrid for pain, quality of life, or self-efficacy. Compared to in-person formats, the virtual format resulted in statistically, but not clinically, lower function scores, and the hybrid format resulted in statistically and clinically fewer chair stand repetitions. Conclusion: Despite limited guidance available on implementation, virtual and hybrid OAMP appear both accepted and generally effective for participants.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30894
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
VanDamme_Jill_K_2024DEC_PhD.pdf
Embargoed until: 2025-12-18
1.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue