Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty of Science
  4. Department of Biology
  5. Biology Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30781
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmith LA-
dc.contributor.authorChow-Fraser P-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-11T19:43:05Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-11T19:43:05Z-
dc.date.issued2010-05-
dc.identifier.issn0364-152X-
dc.identifier.issn1432-1009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/30781-
dc.description.abstractOver the next half century the human population is expected to grow rapidly, resulting in the conversion of rural areas into cities. Wetlands in these regions are therefore under threat, even though they have important ecosystem services and functions. Many obligate marsh-nesting birds in North America have shown declines over the past 40 years, and it is important to evaluate marsh bird community response to increased urbanization. We surveyed 20 coastal marshes in southern Ontario, Canada, and found that obligate marsh-nesting birds preferred rural over urban wetlands, generalist marsh-nesting birds showed no preference, while synanthropic species showed a trend towards increased richness and abundance in urban marshes. The Index of Marsh Bird Community Integrity (IMBCI) was calculated for each wetland and we found significantly higher scores in rural compared to urban wetlands. The presence of a forested buffer surrounding the marsh was not an important factor in predicting the distribution of generalists, obligates, synanthropic species, or the IMBCI. More isolated marshes had a lower species richness of obligate marsh-nesters and a lower IMBCI than less isolated marshes. Based on our results, we recommend that urban land use is not the dominant land use within 1000 m from any wetland, as it negatively affects the abundance and richness of obligate marsh-nesters, and the overall integrity of the avian community. We also recommend that all existing wetlands be conserved to mitigate against isolation effects and to preserve biodiversity. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.-
dc.publisherSpringer Nature-
dc.subject41 Environmental Sciences-
dc.subject4102 Ecological Applications-
dc.subject3103 Ecology-
dc.subject31 Biological Sciences-
dc.subjectRural Health-
dc.subjectHealth Disparities-
dc.subject14 Life Below Water-
dc.subject15 Life on Land-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectBirds-
dc.subjectConservation of Natural Resources-
dc.subjectEnvironmental Monitoring-
dc.subjectGeographic Information Systems-
dc.subjectOntario-
dc.subjectPopulation Dynamics-
dc.subjectUrbanization-
dc.subjectWetlands-
dc.titleImpacts of Adjacent Land Use and Isolation on Marsh Bird Communities-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.date.updated2025-01-11T19:43:03Z-
dc.contributor.departmentBiology-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9475-5-
Appears in Collections:Biology Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Smith and Chow-Fraser 2010.pdf
Open Access
726 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue