Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty of Science
  4. Department of Biology
  5. Biology Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30775
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCvetkovic M-
dc.contributor.authorChow-Fraser P-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-11T19:38:31Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-11T19:38:31Z-
dc.date.issued2011-11-
dc.identifier.issn1470-160X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/30775-
dc.description.abstractOver 2000 coastal wetland complexes have been identified in the Laurentian Great Lakes watershed, each providing critical habitat for numerous aquatic and terrestrial species. Research has shown there is a direct link between anthropogenic activities (urbanization and agricultural development) and deterioration in wetland health in terms of water quality and biotic integrity. In this study, we evaluate coastal marshes throughout the Great Lakes basin using a suite of published ecological indices developed specifically for coastal wetlands of the Great Lakes (Water Quality Index (WQI), Wetland Macrophyte Index (WMI), and the Wetland Fish Index (WFIBasin)). We surveyed 181 wetlands, including 19 in Lake Superior (11%), 11 in Lake Michigan (6%), 13 in Lake Huron (7%), 92 in Georgian Bay and the North Channel (51%), 18 in Lake Erie (10%), and 28 in Lake Ontario (15%), over a 13 year period (1995-2008). Water quality parameters were measured at every site, while paired fyke nets were used to assess the fish community (132 sites) and macrophytes were surveyed and identified to species (174 sites); all of this information was used to calculate the associated index scores. One-way ANOVA results showed that there were significant differences in wetland quality among lakes. According to the WQI, we found that over 50% of marshes in Lakes Michigan, Erie, and Ontario were in degraded condition, while over 70% of marshes in Lakes Superior, Huron, and Georgian Bay were minimally impacted. Georgian Bay had the highest proportion of wetlands in very good and excellent condition and least number of wetlands in a degraded state. The WMI and WFI showed similar results. This is the largest bi-national database of coastal wetlands and the first study to provide a snapshot of the quality of coastal habitats within the Great Lakes basin. We recommend this information be used to guide conservation and restoration efforts within the Laurentian Great Lakes. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.subject41 Environmental Sciences-
dc.subject4104 Environmental Management-
dc.subject15 Life on Land-
dc.titleUse of ecological indicators to assess the quality of Great Lakes coastal wetlands-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.date.updated2025-01-11T19:38:31Z-
dc.contributor.departmentBiology-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.005-
Appears in Collections:Biology Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cvetkovic and Chow-Fraser 2011.pdf
Open Access
515.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue